No abstract

Our systematic review of existing literature highlights that provider's age, sex, experience, specialty, and the interplay between provider and patient characteristics are important variables in pain management. However, generalizations relating to these findings are limited by the heterogeneity of the studies and the paucity of literature in this field.

No abstract

Objectives This study aimed to compare the performance of the CURB-65, A-DROP, and NEWS scores for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in a Colombian population. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from patients with CAP seen within the emergency department, general ward hospitalization, and intensive care unit in a tertiary care health institution located in Cundinamarca, from January 2012 to December 2020. Results A total of 1651 patients were included in our study. CURB-65 and A-DROP scores showed a good performance for primary outcomes related to in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69–0.76) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65–0.73), respectively. On the other hand, NEWS score exhibited an acceptable performance in predicting in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality; furthermore, it showed better performance in anticipating the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy (AUC-ROC of 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59–0.69] and AUC-ROC of 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60–0.69], respectively). Conclusions Our findings suggest that, in patients with CAP, the use of CURB-65, A-DROP, and NEWS scores helps the clinician to predict in-hospital and 30-day mortality. However, NEWS score proves to be a more convenient tool to predict the need for several life support measures and management in the intensive care unit.