No abstract

Purpose Ambulatory surgery is a major area of surgical and anesthetic practice, and preoperative clinics are being increasingly used for low-risk surgical procedures. This study investigated the impact of preoperative evaluation on perioperative events in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 968 consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery. Details of medical conditions, surgical, anesthetic, and postoperative information were collected from medical records. A logistic regression model was developed using propensity score adjustment for baseline characteristics. Results Out 968 patients included, 240 (24.7%) underwent outpatient preoperative evaluation. There were no perioperative major cardiovascular events. Hypertension occurred in 319 (33%) patients, accounting for 79.7% of all adverse events. Preoperative evaluation resulted in a lower hypertension rate after adjustment for propensity score (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.41-0.93); no effects were observed on posterior capsule rupture and emergency visits/hospitalization within 7 days of surgery. Eighty-nine patients (9.3%) had an initial systolic pressure ≥ 180 mm Hg, which was not associated with higher risk of posterior capsule rupture (P = 0.158) or postoperative adverse events (P = 0.902). Median waiting time to surgery was 6 and 2 months for evaluated and non-evaluated patients, respectively (Po0.001). Conclusions In the context of low-risk surgery and no major perioperative and postoperative outcomes, it appears that outpatient preoperative evaluation has no role in reducing adverse events in cataract surgery candidates. Despite fewer hypertensive episodes observed in evaluated patients, these episodes were not associated with any medical or surgical outcomes.

These results suggest that sevoflurane anaesthesia seems to have superior protective and antioxidant effects to isoflurane anaesthesia, not only during cold preservation but also in the early phase of liver reperfusion.

Although several advances have been made in the management of acute coronary syndromes, the adoption of such measures in clinical practice has been suboptimal. The implementation of critical pathways has been suggested as a strategy to improve clinical effectiveness, although its effect is still to be demonstrated. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a critical pathway on the process of care of patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes in a teaching hospital. In a prospective cohort study, patients 30 years or older admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndromes were evaluated. Primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events, percutaneous coronary intervention, and in-hospital mortality during 1 semester before and 4 semesters after implementation of the pathway. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for differences between the periods studied and to identify predictors of poor prognosis. Of the 1003 patients evaluated, 150 (15%) had myocardial infarction, and 240 (24%) had unstable angina. There was no difference in clinical characteristics and risk assessment in the periods evaluated. Overall, the quality of care improved after the pathway, with a significant decrease in complication and mortality rates in the last 2 years. In multivariate analysis, patients admitted in the last semester showed fewer major cardiovascular events (odds ratio = 0.74; P = 0.02) and more percutaneous coronary intervention (odds ratio = 1.3; P = 0.03). The implementation of a critical pathway may have a positive impact on the quality of care of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Further studies are needed to evaluate better this and other initiatives aimed at maximizing clinical effectiveness.

We report the case of a 42-year-old