The phytohormone salicylic acid (SA) is a small phenolic compound that regulates diverse physiological processes, in particular plant resistance against pathogens. Understanding SA-mediated signaling has been a major focus of plant research. Pathogen-induced SA is mainly synthesized via the isochorismate pathway in chloroplasts, with ICS1 (ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE 1) being a critical enzyme. Calcium signaling regulates activities of a subset of transcription factors thereby activating nuclear ICS1 expression. The produced SA triggers extensive transcriptional reprogramming in which NPR1 (NON-EXPRESSOR of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1) functions as the central coactivator of TGA transcription factors. Recently, two alternative but not exclusive models for SA perception mechanisms were proposed. The first model is that NPR1 homologs, NPR3 and NPR4, perceive SA thereby regulating NPR1 protein accumulation. The second model describes that NPR1 itself perceives SA, triggering an NPR1 conformational change thereby activating SA-mediated transcription. Besides the direct SA binding, NPR1 is also regulated by SA-mediated redox changes and phosphorylation. Emerging evidence show that pathogen virulence effectors target SA signaling, further strengthening the importance of SA-mediated immunity.

The phytohormone network consisting of jasmonate, ethylene, PHYTOALEXIN-DEFICIENT4, and salicylic acid signaling is required for the two modes of plant immunity, pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), and effector-triggered immunity (ETI). A previous study showed that during PTI, the transcriptional responses of over 5000 genes qualitatively depend on complex interactions between the network components. However, the role of the network in transcriptional reprogramming during ETI and whether it differs between PTI and ETI remain elusive. Here, we generated time-series RNA-sequencing data of wild-type and combinatorial mutant plants deficient in components of the network upon challenge with virulent or ETI-triggering avirulent strains of the foliar bacterial pathogen Resistant plants such as the wild type achieved high-amplitude transcriptional reprogramming 4 h after challenge with avirulent strains and sustained this transcriptome response. Strikingly, susceptible plants including the quadruple network mutant showed almost identical transcriptome responses to resistant plants but with several hours delay. Furthermore, gene coexpression network structure was highly conserved between the wild type and quadruple mutant. Thus, in contrast to PTI, the phytohormone network is required only for achieving high-amplitude transcriptional reprogramming within the early time window of ETI against this bacterial pathogen.

Single-cell approaches are quickly changing our view on biological systems by increasing the spatiotemporal resolution of our analyses to the level of the individual cell. The field of plant biology has fully embraced single-cell transcriptomics and is rapidly expanding the portfolio of available technologies and applications. In this review, we give an overview of the main advances in plant single-cell transcriptomics over the past few years and provide the reader with an accessible guideline covering all steps, from sample preparation to data analysis. We end by offering a glimpse of how these technologies will shape and accelerate plant-specific research in the near future. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Plant Biology, Volume 72 is May 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Summary Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and nucleotide‐binding domain and leucine‐rich repeat (LRR)‐containing proteins (NLRs) initiate pattern‐triggered immunity (PTI) and effector‐triggered immunity (ETI), respectively, each associated with the activation of an overlapping set of defence genes. The regulatory mechanism behind this convergence of PTI‐ and ETI‐mediated defence gene induction remains elusive.We generated transgenic Arabidopsis plants that enable conditional NLR activation without pathogen infection to dissect NLR‐ and PRR‐mediated transcriptional signals. A comparative analysis of over 40 transcriptome datasets linked calmodulin‐binding transcription activators (CAMTAs) to the activation of overlapping defence genes in PTI and ETI. We used a dominant camta3 mutant (camta3‐D) to assess CAMTA functions in the corresponding transcriptional regulation.Transcriptional regulation by NLRs, although highly similar to PTI responses, can be established independently of pathogen‐associated molecular pattern (PAMP) perception, defence phytohormones and host cell death. Conditional expression of the N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain of the barley MLA (Mildew resistance locus A) NLR is sufficient to trigger similar transcriptional reprogramming as full‐length NLRs. CAMTA‐binding motifs are overrepresented in the 5′ regulatory regions of the identified primary immune response genes, consistent with their altered expression and disease resistance responses in camta3‐D plants.We propose that CAMTA‐mediated transcriptional regulation defines an early convergence point in NLR‐ and PRR‐mediated signalling.

Differentiation of xylem elements involves cell expansion, secondary cell wall (SCW) deposition and programmed cell death. Transitions between these phases require strict spatiotemporal control.The function of Populus ERF139 (Potri.013G101100) in xylem differentiation was characterized in transgenic overexpression and dominant repressor lines of ERF139 in hybrid aspen (Populus tremula 9 tremuloides). Xylem properties, SCW chemistry and downstream targets were analyzed in both types of transgenic trees using microscopy techniques, Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy, pyrolysis-GC/MS, wet chemistry methods and RNA sequencing.Opposite phenotypes were observed in the secondary xylem vessel sizes and SCW chemistry in the two different types of transgenic trees, supporting the function of ERF139 in suppressing the radial expansion of vessel elements and stimulating accumulation of guaiacyltype lignin and possibly also xylan. Comparative transcriptomics identified genes related to SCW biosynthesis (LAC5, LBD15, MYB86) and salt and drought stress-responsive genes (ANAC002, ABA1) as potential direct targets of ERF139.The phenotypes of the transgenic trees and the stem expression profiles of ERF139 potential target genes support the role of ERF139 as a transcriptional regulator of xylem cell expansion and SCW formation, possibly in response to osmotic changes of the cells.