This paper investigates the effects of pre-IPO banking relationships on a firm's IPO. Using a new and unique data set, which compares the firm's pre-IPO banking relationships to the underwriters managing the firm's new issue, I test whether banking relationships established before the firm's IPO ameliorate asymmetric information problems behind high IPO underpricing. The results show that firms with a pre-IPO banking relationship with a prospective underwriter face about 17% lower underpricing than firms without such banking relationships. These results are robust to controlling for the firm's endogenous selection of the pre-IPO banking institution. * Schenone is with the Finance Department, University of Minnesota. I am grateful to my advisors, Kathleen Hagerty, Mitchell Petersen, and William Rogerson for their advice, comments and suggestions. I am also indebted to Luca Benzoni, Federico Ciliberto, Richard Green (the editor), Andy Winton, and to an anonymous referee for insightful comments and suggestions. I thank
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.