The Fracture Liaison Service has successfully identified and evaluated most patients with fractures. Only those patients who declined were not evaluated. The ultimate success of the program will be measured by the subsequent fracture experience of these patients, but clear improvements in diagnosing and treating low bone mineral density in patients with fracture have already been demonstrated.

Introduction Despite vertebral fracture being a significant risk factor for further fracture, vertebral fractures are often unrecognised. A study was therefore conducted to determine the proportion of patients presenting with a nonvertebral fracture who also have an unrecognised vertebral fracture. Methods Prospective study of patients presenting with a non-vertebral fracture in South Glasgow who underwent DXA evaluation with vertebral morphometry (MXA) from DV5/6 to LV4/5. Vertebral deformities (consistent with fracture) were identified by direct visualisation using the Genant semi-quantitative grading scale. Results Data were available for 337 patients presenting with low trauma non-vertebral fracture; 261 were female. Of all patients, 10.4% were aged 50-64 years, 53.2% were aged 65-74 years and 36.2% were aged 75 years or over. According to WHO definitions, 35.0% of patients had normal lumbar spine BMD (T-score j1 or above), 37.4% were osteopenic (T-score j1.1 to j2.4) and 27.6% osteoporotic (Tscore j2.5 or lower). Humerus (n=103, 31%), radius-ulna (n=90, 27%) and hand/foot (n=53, 16%) were the most common fractures. For 72% of patients (n=241) the presenting fracture was the first low trauma fracture to come to clinical attention. The overall prevalence of vertebral deformity established by MXA was 25% (n=83); 45% (n=37) of patients with vertebral deformity had deformities of more than one vertebra. Of the patients with vertebral deformity and readable scans for grading, 72.5% (58/80) had deformities of grade 2 or 3. Patients presenting with hip fracture, or spine T-score ej2.5, or low BMI, or with more than one prior non-vertebral fracture were all significantly more likely to have evidence of a prevalent vertebral deformity (p<0.05). However, 19.8% of patients with an osteopenic T-score had a vertebral deformity (48% of which were multiple), and 16.1% of patients with a normal T-score had a vertebral deformity (26.3% of which were multiple). Following non-vertebral fracture, some guidelines suggest that anti-resorptive therapy should be reserved for patients with DXA-proven osteoporosis. However, patients who have one or more prior vertebral fractures (prevalent at the time of their non-vertebral fracture) would also become candidates for anti-resorptive therapy-which would have not been the case had their vertebral fracture status not been known. Overall in this study, 8.9% of patients are likely to have had a change in management by virtue of their underlying vertebral deformity status. In other words, 11 patients who present with a non-vertebral fracture would need to undergo vertebral morphometry in order to identify one patient who ought to be managed differently. Conclusions Our results support the recommendation to perform vertebral morphometry in patients who are

This study confirms almost universal vitamin D inadequacy among 548 elderly patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture, regardless of whether a threshold of 50 nmol/L or 70 nmol/L was used. However, among a prospective subset of 50 patients with clinical fragility fractures, especially those with non-hip fractures, the prevalence of inadequacy was substantially lower. It may be that vitamin D represents a correctable risk factor for fragility fracture in the elderly, possibly specifically for the hip.

The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) allows appropriate antiosteoporosis therapy to be targeted to potentially reduce future fracture risk. A proportion of these treated patients will still experience a further fracture. This work reviews the characteristics of these patients. Data were collated for patients >65 years old presenting to the South Glasgow FLS between January 2001 and August 2004. There were 2,489 patients who presented (incident fracture group), and 129 (5.2%) sustained an additional fracture (refracture group). Median age of the incident fracture group was 77.8 years vs. 80.6 years for the refracture group (P = nonsignificant). The refracture group was determined according to whether their incident fracture was hip (n = 47) or nonhip (n = 82). When the incident fracture was hip, a refracture was more likely to be a further hip fracture (chi(2) = 14.4, P = 0.002) and patients refractured sooner (median time to refracture 194 [range 10-1,134] days vs. 258 [range 6-1,081] days [nonhip]) (P = nonsignificant). In the refracture group, 76% of patients were already on osteoporosis treatment after their incident fracture. Patients over 65 years of age presenting to FLS who sustain an additional fracture are older; are likely to sustain another hip fracture after an incident hip fracture; often refracture early, particularly when the incident fracture is of the hip; and are often already on antiosteoporosis treatment. Therefore, it is important to identify these high-risk patients and offer a combined approach of prompt drug treatment through a systematic and specialist osteoporosis management team along with reducing any reversible falls risk factors.

No abstract