Within Canada, several specialized multi-service prevention programs work with highly vulnerable pregnant and early parenting women with substance use issues. Experiences of trauma, mental health, poverty, and other factors associated with the social determinants of health complete the picture. Program evaluations have demonstrated their value, but less has been said as to women’s reasons for choosing to seek help from these programs, what they were hoping to gain, or what difference they believe has occurred as a result. The Co-creating Evidence project is a multi-year (2017–2020) national evaluation of holistic programs serving women at high risk of having an infant with prenatal alcohol or substance exposure. The evaluation uses a mixed methods design involving quarterly program output and “snapshot” client data, as well as in-person, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires with clients, program staff, and program partners. This article presents findings from interviews with women regarding why they sought help, how they used the services, and what they perceived to be the most significant change in their lives as a result. Obtaining help with substance use was the top theme for what women hoped to get from their participation in their program; however, women’s reasons were often intertwined. Additional motivations included wanting information, support or assistance with: child welfare; pregnancy; housing; getting connected to health care or prenatal care; and opportunities for peer support. With respect to the most significant life change, themes included: reduced substance use; improved housing; stronger mother–child connection; and improved wellness and social connections. Findings demonstrated that vulnerable, marginalized pregnant and parenting women who are using substances will seek help when health and social care services are configured in such a way as to take into consideration and address their unique roles, responsibilities, and realities.

Background: In Canada, several community-based, multi-service programs aimed at reaching vulnerable pregnant or parenting women with substance use and complex issues have emerged. These programs offer basic needs and social supports along with perinatal, primary, and mental health care, as well as substance use services. Evaluations of these 'one-stop' programs have demonstrated positive outcomes; nevertheless, few published studies have focused on how these programs are structured, on their cross-sectoral partnerships, and on clients' perceptions of their services. Methods: The Co-Creating Evidence (CCE) project was a three-year evaluation of eight multi-service programs located in six Canadian jurisdictions. The study used a mixed-methods design involving semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, output data, and de-identified client data. This article focuses on qualitative interviews undertaken with 125 clients during the first round of site visits, supplemented by interview data with program staff and service partners. Results: Each of the programs in the CCE study employs a multi-service model that both reflects a wrap-around approach to care and is intentionally geared to removing barriers to accessing services. The programs are either operated by a health authority (n = 4) or by a community-based agency (n = 4). The programs' focus on the social determinants of health, and their provision of primary, prenatal, perinatal and mental health care services is essential; similarly, on-site substance use and trauma/violence related services is pivotal. Further, programs' support in relation to women's child welfare issues promotes collaboration, common understanding of expectations, and helps to prevent child/infant removals. Conclusions: The programs involved in the Co-Creating Evidence study have impressively blended social and primary care and prenatal care. Their success in respectfully and flexibly responding to women's diverse needs, interests and readiness, within a community-based, wraparound service delivery model paves the way for others offering pre-and postnatal programming.

Wraparound programmes, wherein multiple services are offered at one location, are effective in engaging pregnant or parenting women experiencing substance use and other complex challenges while also addressing gaps in services between the health, child welfare and addictions fields. Evaluations of these programmes have demonstrated positive outcomes; nevertheless, few studies have focused on how programmes' cross-sectoral partnerships are structured and the difference these partnerships make. Drawing on the Co-Creating Evidence study, a three-year Canadian evaluation of eight multi-service programmes in six provinces, this article examines the partnerships that make wraparound service delivery possible. The study used a mixed-methods design involving interviews, questionnaires, output and de-identified client data; this article reports on qualitative findings only. Sixty service partners and 108 programme staff were interviewed in 2018 and 2019. Qualitative data analysis techniques were applied; NVivo12 software (QRS International, Melbourne, Australia) was utilised to facilitate the analyses. In terms of the programmes' partnership characteristics, overall, programmes more commonly formed partnerships with child welfare, health services (e.g. primary care, public health and perinatal care) and specialised health services such as mental health services, maternal addictions and Opioid Agonist Therapy. The programmes had fewer partnerships with housing, income assistance, Indigenous cultural programming, infant development and legal services. Key benefits of partnerships included: clients' improved access to health and social care, addressing social determinants of health; partners' increased knowledge about the significance of trauma in relation to women's substance use; improved child welfare outcomes and strengthened cultural safety and (re)connection. Key challenges included: tensions between partners regarding differing perceptions, mandates and responsibilities; personal differences and systemic barriers. Lastly, by means of steady dialogue and collaboration, partners increased their appreciation and use of the trauma-informed, harm reduction approaches that are central to wraparound programmes.

No abstract

No abstract