No abstract
SUMMARYMany states in the US have enacted quick clearance laws requiring drivers of vehicles involved in minor incidents to move their vehicles from travel lanes prior to the arrival of first responders. Since little is known about the effectiveness of these laws, this research sought to find the benefit-cost ratio of advertising quick clearance legislation to improve driver compliance, and compare it with benefit-cost ratios of other incident management strategies, particularly traffic cameras, freeway service patrols, and traffic sensors. The analysis used traffic simulation that applied application programming interfaces to produce random spatial and temporal occurrence of incidents, including incident start times, durations, and locations, based on normal distributions developed from field data, to test before and after the law scenarios. The results provide decision makers with support for prioritizing funding between these incident management strategies and indicated that investments in the advertisement of this law was beneficial.
The challenges posed by the Montreal Protocol and its subsequent amendments towards the reduction in usage of ozone depleting Halons have stimulated the fire protection industry to rethink its approach to fire protection management. This has promoted research and development of new techniques with low environmental risks and a more specific approach to reduction of fire risks. In order to assist the Oil & Gas Industry in selecting the optimum means of protection for its activities the Exploration & Production (E&P)Forum of the industry has focused attention on risk reduction measures through its Fire Hazard Management Sub-Committee to produce guidance documentation and strategies. These cover the current position of regulatory trends and the technology applications. The contents of this paper disseminate the update guidance given by E&P Forum in its publications to phase out Halons and select alternative technologies, both for onshore and offshore facilities and developments. The paper addresses the advantages and constraints of halon like gases, water mist systems, inert gas flooding, incipient fire detection and emerging technologies. This identifies the opportunities for effective fire protective design, incorporating current research into fire water applications and large tank fire protection and the consequent application of a low capital investment in fire protective systems and guidance to where inherent safety in design may be applied. Introduction For almost three decades, the halon group of chemicals (i.e., halocarbons containing fluorine, chlorine, and bromine) have been an almost automatic choice for many types of fire response, such that other opportunities to reduce fire risks remained under developed. However, the chlorine and bromine in halons have been identified as contributors to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. International concern over the effects of halocarbons on the ozone layer led to the 1987Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and its subsequent revisions.
Deciding on a fire protection strategy when replacing halon fixed-flood extinguishment or inerting systems in existing E&P facilities or for new designs can be challenging, since the technology and public policy (regulations) are changing so rapidly. To further complicate decision-making, performance data for alternative fire fighting technologies are sometimes reported selectively or do not completely reflect fire risks in E&P industry applications. To assist in this decision-making process, the Halon Issues Sub-Committee of the Oil Industry International Exploration and Production Forum (E&P Forum) has issued a series of technical guidance reports (Ref. 7, 8, 9, 10) on considerations for halon phase-out. The considerations presented in this paper, from those E&P Forum guidance reports. are intended to assist in the process of halon phase-out and the selection of alternative and replacement fire fighting strategies. The considerations cover: regulatory trends which may influence agent selection; risk assessment; inherent fire safety design principles (Ref. 7); incipient fire condition detection and manual response; halon-like gases; water mist systems; inert gas flood systems; halon banking; and emerging fire fighting technology. Introduction For almost three decades, the halon group of chemicals (i.e., halocarbons containing fluorine, chlorine, and bromine) has been — in fire fighting terms — such a panacea that they were used widely throughout the world and across most industries. However, the chlorine and bromine in halons have been identified as potential contributors to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. International concern over the effects of halocarbons on the ozone layer led to the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and its subsequent revisions in June 1990 and November 1992. Resulting national regulations to phase out production — and in some countries, use — of halons, made after the discovery of their deleterious environmental effects, were perceived to leave a large gap in the fire fighter's armory. Such were the almost magical properties of halon that considerable effort has been expended trying to develop "drop-in" replacements, with particular emphasis on total flood applications. It is manifest that any halon replacement (halon-like) or alternative (everything else) should have the same characteristics as halon without potential adverse environmental effects. The main characteristics of halon that are looked for in a replacement or alternative include:–Non-toxic to humans at the design concentration–A clean extinguishant (no residue)–Rapid knock-down of flames–Not electrically conductive–Low design extinguishing concentration–Suitability for inerting applications–Compact and long-term agent storage The paper concludes that environmentally benign fire extinguishing techniques can be used in many E&P industry applications. Anthropogenic (man-made) fire extinguishing gases that accumulate in the atmosphere should only be used where required by law or are the only cost effective and people-safe option. The challenge for the E&P operator is to select an appropriate fire-protection strategy confronted by often confusing claims, selective reporting of fire test results, rapidly changing technology, and environmental regulations as well as limited real fire fighting experience with some of the new technologies. P. 657
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.