The in vivo alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, hereafter the Comet assay, can be used to investigate the genotoxicity of industrial chemicals, biocides, agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. The major advantages of this assay include the relative ease of application to any tissue of interest, the detection of multiple classes of DNA damage and the generation of data at the level of the single cell. These features give the Comet assay potential advantages over other in vivo test methods, which are limited largely to proliferating cells and/or a single tissue. The Comet assay has demonstrated its reliability in many testing circumstances and is, in general, considered to be acceptable for regulatory purposes. However, despite the considerable data published on the in vivo Comet assay and the general agreement within the international scientific community over many protocol-related issues, it was felt that a document giving detailed practical guidance on the protocol required for regulatory acceptance of the assay was required. In a recent meeting held in conjunction with the 4th International Comet Assay Workshop (Ulm, Germany, 22-25 July 2001) an expert panel reviewed existing data and recent developments of the Comet assay with a view to developing such a document. This paper is intended to act as an update to the more general guidelines which were published as a result of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures. The recommendations are also seen as a major step towards gaining more formal regulatory acceptance of the Comet assay.

No abstract

Perillaldehyde, a natural monocyclic terpenoid found most abundantly in the herb perilla, has a long history of use as a flavouring ingredient to add spiciness and citrus taste to foods. Previously, it was judged to be safe by several international expert panels. To confirm the safety of flavourings placed on the European Union list of flavourings, perillaldehyde was selected by the European Food Safety Authority as a representative of a subgroup of alicyclic aldehyde flavouring substances to be evaluated for genotoxic potential. Perillaldehyde was tested in a bacterial reverse mutation assay, an in vitro micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes, an HPRT assay in mouse lymphoma cells, and a micronucleus/comet assay in Han Wistar rats. In contrast to previously published results, perillaldehyde induced mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA98 in the absence of metabolic activation. The comet assay was negative for duodenum and weakly positive for liver but only at a hepatotoxic dose of perillaldehyde. All other genotoxicity assays were negative. These data do not provide an indication of any genotoxic potential for perillaldehyde, and they provide the primary basis for recent scientific opinions regarding perillaldehyde genotoxicity announced by several international organizations responsible for safety assessment of food additives and flavourings.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Lanthanum was evaluated for potential genotoxicity using a range of in vitro assays (as the carbonate) in the presence and absence of post-mitochondrial fraction (S9) and in vivo in three independent tests for mutagenicity and clastogenicity (as the carbonate and chloride). The drug was devoid of mutagenic activity in bacterial assays (maximum concentration 5000 microg/plate) using a range of test strains (Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, TA100 and TA102 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA and WP2 uvrA pkm101). No effects were seen in the hgprt gene mutation assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of S9. In the absence of S9, sporadic increases in revertant numbers were not dose-related or reproducible in subsequent experiments and hence were concluded to be chance events. In an in vitro chromosome aberration assay using Chinese hamster ovary cells, chromosome damage in the presence and absence of S9 (concentration 200-5000 microg/ml) was attributed to overt cell toxicity. To confirm this, a comprehensive in vivo evaluation of the drug was performed. Negative results were obtained in two independent rodent micronucleus tests. In the first mice were given oral doses (of carbonate) up to 2000 mg/kg, in the second rats were given a single i.v. bolus injection (of chloride) up to 0.1 mg/kg. Negative results were also obtained in a rat liver unscheduled DNA synthesis assay after treatment for 28 days with i.v. bolus injections (of chloride) up to 0.1 mg/kg/day. In these in vivo studies lanthanum plasma concentrations were >3000 times higher than the steady-state peak plasma concentration observed in dialysis patients given therapeutic doses of lanthanum carbonate. It can be concluded that lanthanum is not genotoxic and that lanthanum carbonate is unlikely to present a latent hazard in therapeutic use.