Our objective was to assess the capability of state administrative health care databases to evaluate the quality of immunization rates for a Medicaid managed care population. Data on 5599 2 year olds were obtained from a Medicaid claims database, a health department database, and the records of the children's assigned providers. The study was conducted on 1 managed care program in 1 state. Test performance ratio analyses were used to assess the relative accuracy and contribution of each source of administrative data. We found that of the 67,188 doses needed, 45,511 (68%) were documented as administered per at least 1 of the data sources. Medicaid claims data alone accounted for 18% of immunized children, while health department data used by itself accounted for 12%. Together, these 2 sources identified 34% of immunized children. Large administrative databases, such as Medicaid claims and data from a health department, while valuable sources of information on quality, may underestimate outcomes such as immunization rates. Assessments of the quality of health care should rely on a combination of administrative data and providers' records as sources of information.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.