High-throughput proteomic studies of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have the potential to be a powerful tool for examining the clinical course of disease. However, advances in FFPE tissue-based proteomics have been hampered by inefficient methods to extract proteins from archival tissue and by an incomplete knowledge of formaldehyde-induced modifications in proteins. To help address these problems, we have developed a procedure for the formation of 'tissue surrogates' to model FFPE tissues. Cytoplasmic proteins, such as lysozyme or ribonuclease A, at concentrations approaching the protein content in whole cells, are fixed with 10% formalin to form gelatin-like plugs. These plugs have sufficient physical integrity to be processed through graded alcohols, xylene, and embedded in paraffin according to standard histological procedures. In this study, we used tissue surrogates formed from one or two proteins to evaluate extraction protocols for their ability to quantitatively extract proteins from the surrogates. Optimal protein extraction was obtained using a combination of heat, a detergent, and a protein denaturant. The addition of a reducing agent did not improve protein recovery; however, recovery varied significantly with pH. Protein extraction of 480% was observed for pH 4 buffers containing 2% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) when heated at 1001C for 20 min, followed by incubation at 601C for 2 h. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the extracted proteins revealed that the surrogate extracts contained a mixture of monomeric and multimeric proteins, regardless of the extraction protocol employed. Additionally, protein extracts from surrogates containing carbonic anhydrase:lysozyme (1:2 mol/mol) had disproportionate percentages of lysozyme, indicating that selective protein extraction in complex multiprotein systems may be a concern in proteomic studies of FFPE tissues.

Site-directed mutagenesis and design of Zn(2+)-binding centers have been used to determine a set of specific tertiary interactions between the mu-opioid receptor, a rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), and its cyclic peptide agonist ligand, Tyr(1)-c(S-Et-S)[d-Cys(2)-Phe(3)-d-Pen(4)]NH(2) (JOM6). The binding affinity of the tetrapeptide is strongly dependent on the nature of its first and third residues and on substitutions at positions 213, 216, 237, 300, 315, and 318 of the mu-opioid receptor. His(1) and His(3) analogues of the ligand were able to form metal-binding complexes with the V300C and G213C/T315C receptor mutants, respectively. Direct contact of the Phe(3) residue of JOM6 with Gly(213), Asp(216), Thr(315), and Trp(318) of the receptor was suggested by the binding affinities of His(3)-, Nle(3)-, Leu(3)-, Aci(3)-, Delta(E)Phe(3)-, and Delta(Z)Phe(3)-substituted peptides with the G213C/T315C, D216V, T315C, and W318L mutants. The improved binding affinity of the free carboxylate analogue of JOM6 for binding to the E229D mutant revealed an interaction between the C-terminal group of the peptide and Glu(229) of the receptor. The experimental constraints that were obtained were applied for distance geometry modeling of the mu-receptor in complex with the tetrapeptide agonist ligand, JOM6. The active conformation of the opioid receptor was calculated using the crystal structure of "inactive" rhodopsin and published engineered and intrinsic metal-binding sites and disulfide bonds that allow or facilitate activation of GPCRs. Interhelical H-bonds existing in the mu-receptor were applied as additional distance constraints. The calculated model of the receptor-ligand complex can serve as a prototype of the active state for all rhodopsin-like GPCRs. It displays a strongly shifted transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) and reorientation of the conserved Trp(293) residue in TM6 upon its interaction with the agonist. Importantly, the binding pockets of the active and inactive states are not identical, which implies distinct interaction modes of agonists and antagonists. In the active state, the binding pocket of the mu-receptor is complementary to the previously proposed receptor-bound conformation of JOM6.

Publication of the rhodopsin X-ray structure has facilitated the development of homology models of other G protein-coupled receptors. However, possible shifts of transmembrane (TM) alpha helices, expected variations in helical distortions, and differences in loop size necessitate experimental verification of these comparative models. To refine a rhodopsin-based homology model of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), we experimentally determined structural-distance constraints from intrinsic and engineered metal-binding sites in the rat MOR. Investigating the relatively high intrinsic affinity of MOR for Zn(2+) (IC(50) approximately 30microM), we observed that mutation of His(319) (TM7) abolished Zn(2+) inhibition of ligand binding, while mutation of Asp(216) (extracellular loop 2) decreased the effect of Zn(2+), suggesting these residues participate in the intrinsic Zn(2+)-binding center of MOR. To verify the relative orientation of TM5 and TM6 and to examine whether a rhodopsin-like alpha aneurism is present in TM5, we engineered Zn(2+)-binding centers by mutating residues of TM5 and TM6 to Cys or His, making use of the native His(297) in TM6 as an additional Zn(2+)-coordination site. Inhibition of opioid ligand binding by Zn(2+) suggests that residues Ile(234) and Phe(237) in TM5 face the binding-site crevice and form a metal-binding center with His(297) and Val(300) in TM6. This observation is inconsistent with a rhodopsin-like structure, which would locate Ile(234) on the lipid-exposed side of TM5, too distant from other residues making up the Zn(2+)-binding site. Subsequent distance geometry refinement of the MOR model indicates that the rhodopsin-like alpha aneurism is likely absent in TM2 but present in TM5.

Opioid receptor binding conformations for two structurally related, conformationally constrained tetrapeptides, JOM-6 ( micro receptor selective) and JOM-13 (delta receptor selective), were deduced using conformational analysis of these ligands and analogs with additional conformational restrictions. Docking of these ligands in their binding conformations to opioid receptor structural models, based upon the published rhodopsin X-ray structure, implicates specific structural features of the micro and delta receptor ligand binding sites as forming the basis for the micro selectivity of JOM-6 and the delta selectivity of JOM-13. In particular, the presence of E229 in the micro receptor (in place of the corresponding D210 of the delta receptor) causes an adverse electrostatic interaction with C-terminal carboxylate-containing ligands, resulting in the observed preference of ligands with an uncharged C-terminus for the micro receptor. In addition, the requirement that the Phe3 side chain of JOM-13 assume a gauche orientation for optimal delta binding, whereas the Phe3 side chain of JOM-6 must be in a trans orientation for high-affinity micro binding can be largely attributed to the steric effect of replacement of L300 of the delta receptor by W318 of the micro receptor. Testing this hypothesis by examining the binding of JOM-6 and several of its key analogs with specific micro receptor mutants is described. Our initial results are consistent with the proposed ligand-receptor interaction models.

No abstract

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues generally provide low yields of extractable RNA that exhibit both covalent modification of nucleic acid bases and strand cleavage. This frustrates efforts to perform retrospective analyses of gene expression using archival tissue specimens. A variety of conditions have been reported to demodify formaldehyde-fixed RNA in different model systems. We studied the reversal of formaldehyde fixation of RNA using a 50 base RNA oligonucleotide and total cellular RNA. Formaldehyde-adducted, native, and hydrolyzed RNA species were identified by their bioanalyzer electrophoretic migration patterns and RT-quantitative PCR. Demodification conditions included temperature, time, buffer, and pH. The reversal of formaldehyde-fixed RNA to native species without apparent RNA hydrolysis was most successfully performed in dilute Tris, phosphate, or similar buffers (pH 8) at 70°C for 30 minutes. Amines were not required for efficient formaldehyde demodification. Formaldehyde-fixed RNA was more labile than native RNA to treatment with heat and buffer, suggesting that antigen retrieval methods for proteins may impede RNA hybridization or RNA extraction. Taken together, the data indicate that reliable conditions may be used to remove formaldehyde adducts from RNA to improve the quality of RNA available for molecular studies. Formaldehyde fixation followed by dehydration and paraffin embedding (FFPE) is commonly used to preserve tissue specimens for histological studies and provides most archival tissue samples. The isolation of high-quality RNA from FFPE tissues remains a challenge for molecular studies, despite the availability of multiple published and commercial methods.1 RNA degradation and formaldehyde modification of RNA appear to be the major contributors to this challenge. Degradation of RNA to low molecular weight species may be because of either sample treatment before and during fixation 2 or long-term (1 year or longer) storage in paraffin.3 RNA extracted from FFPE tissues is usually fragmented to an average of 100 bases in length.4,5 Reproducible RT-PCR on FFPE-extracted RNA is limited to amplicons of fewer than 300 bases.6 Most laboratories strive to amplify segments of 150 or fewer bases. Degraded RNA can often be quantified by techniques that use short oligonucleotides, such as microarray and micro-RNA analyses, and by RTquantitative PCR (qRT-PCR), but the results are almost invariably less sensitive and less reproducible than achieved using RNA extracted from fresh or fresh-frozen sources. 7,8 Formaldehyde modification of nucleic acid bases reduces or blocks the base pairing necessary for molecular analysis by hybridization techniques. It is also responsible for cross-links to other macromolecules that reduce the yield of extracted RNA.9 An improved understanding of these modifications may lead to better strategies for their reversal and to the extraction of RNA that is more suitable for molecular analysis. Previous investigations demonstrated that formaldehyde-induced adducts, s...

High-throughput proteomic studies on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have been hampered by inefficient methods to extract proteins from archival tissue and by an incomplete knowledge of formaldehyde-induced modifications to proteins. We previously reported a method for the formation of 'tissue surrogates' as a model to study formalin fixation, histochemical processing, and protein retrieval from FFPE tissues. In this study, we demonstrate the use of high hydrostatic pressure as a method for efficient protein recovery from FFPE tissue surrogates. Reversal of formaldehyde-induced protein adducts and crosslinks was observed when lysozyme tissue surrogates were extracted at 45 000 psi and 80-1001C in Tris buffers containing 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.2 M glycine at pH 4. These conditions also produced peptides resulting from acid-catalyzed aspartic acid cleavage. Additives such as trimethylamine N-oxide or copper (II) chloride decreased the total percentage of these aspartic acid cleavage products, while maintaining efficient reversal of intermolecular crosslinks in the FFPE tissue surrogates. Mass spectrometry analysis of the recovered lysozyme yielded 70% sequence coverage, correctly identified all formaldehyde-reactive amino acids, and demonstrated hydrolysis at all of the expected trypsin cleavage sites. This study demonstrates that elevated hydrostatic pressure treatment is a promising approach for improving the recovery of proteins from FFPE tissues for proteomic analysis.

Tissue-based proteomic approaches (tissue proteomics) are essential for discovering and evaluating biomarkers for personalized medicine. In any proteomics study, the most critical issue is sample extraction and preparation. This problem is especially difficult when recovering proteins from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. However, improving and standardizing protein extraction from FFPE tissue is a critical need because of the millions of archival FFPE tissues available in tissue banks worldwide. Recent progress in the application of heat-induced antigen retrieval (AR) principles for protein extraction from FFPE tissue has resulted in a number of published FFPE tissue proteomics studies. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal protocol for protein extraction from FFPE tissue or accepted standards for quantitative evaluation of the extracts. Standardization is critical to ensure the accurate evaluation of FFPE protein extracts by proteomic methods such as reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA), which is now in clinical use. In our view, complete solubilization of FFPE tissue samples is the best way to achieve the goal of standardizing the recovery of proteins from FFPE tissues. However, further studies are recommended to develop standardized protein extraction methods to ensure quantitative and qualitative reproducibility in the recovery of proteins from FFPE tissues.