This paper analyses some of the recent research into dyslexia in relation to monolingual and bilingual children. It focuses on the phonological approach to the identification of dyslexia. It reviews the literature on those aspects of phonological development which allow dyslexic children to be identified at increasingly younger ages. The literature on the phonological development of children who speak English as an additional language, and who are bilingual or multilingual, is then reviewed to compare the possibilities for identification of these children in comparison with those for monolingual children. Some methodological issues are critically appraised and suggestions are made for future research and developments in this area.
This study examines a group of children who had attended language unit provision between the ages of 3;6 and 7 years. At follow-up the children were between 7;10 and 13;3 years (mean 9.9 years). Of the 24 children, five went into mainstream school, 12 went into a language unit within a mainstream junior school and seven went to special school provision when they transferred at the end of year 2. Comparisons are drawn between the three groups in five areas, general ability, speech and language ability, literacy, phonological processing ability and behaviour. As a whole, the group continued to perform relatively poorly on most tasks with 19 (79%) continuing to have significantly delayed language development, 15 (62%) delayed reading accuracy and 13 (54%) delayed reading comprehension. Between 10 and 15 were presenting with behaviour difficulties depending on whether their performance is reported by parents or teachers. With some notable exceptions the pattern of results indicated that those children who went straight into mainstream school performed better on all measures than those who either went into further language unit provision or those who went to special schools. However, the differences between the mainstream and language groups did not reach statistical significance for any of the tasks except the two rhyme sub-tests from the Phonological Assessment Battery. The results suggest that there may only be marginal differences (at least on the measures employed in the present study) between those attending units and those deemed to be able to manage in mainstream school. A sub-group (n = 5) was identified which was made up of those children whose language scores had effectively normalized, remained relatively similar to those children whose delays persisted except for the rotation task of the British Ability Scale and for their reading accuracy and spelling. The results are discussed in terms of service provision to children with this type of difficulty.
Transition from one school to another is one form of change which children experience. Extensive research exists to suggest that changes such as this can evoke memories of earlier separations and losses, particularly if the original experience was of a traumatic nature. This paper uses a systemic framework to analyse the impact of externally imposed changes on schools. It considers the extent to which the current focus in schools has become an external one as they aim to accommodate the fast pace of change expected. The paper then considers how this can take the focus away from the individual needs and experiences of children. One small action research project is described which aimed to increase the awareness of staff in two schools about the thoughts and feelings of children involved in the process of transition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.