This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Although pediatric liver transplantation (LT) results in excellent long-term outcomes, a high incidence of early acute cellular rejection and late graft fibrosis persists. Routine measurement of allograft enzymes may not reliably detect rejection episodes, identify candidates for immunosuppression minimization, or indicate allograft fibrosis. Surveillance biopsies (SBs) can provide valuable information in this regard, but their role in pediatric LT is not fully established. A retrospective cohort of 236 pediatric LT recipients from a high-volume center was studied to characterize the risks and benefits of SB versus for-cause biopsies (FCBs). The study population was 47.1% male and 54.7% Hispanic, and 31% received living donor grafts. Our data suggest that patients in the SB group had better transplant outcomes (rejection-free, graft, and patient survival) compared with patients who had FCBs or who never underwent biopsy. Among 817 biopsies obtained from 236 patients, 150 (18.4%) were SBs. Only 6 patients had a biopsy-related complication, and none were observed in the SB subset. Graft biochemical blood tests did not accurately predict rejection severity on biopsy, with aspartate aminotransferase area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.66, alanine aminotransferase AUROC 0.65 (very poor predictions), and gammaglutamyltransferase AUROC 0.58 (no prediction). SBs identified subclinical rejection in 18.6% of biopsies, whereas 63.3% of SBs had evidence of fibrosis. SBs prompted changes in immunosuppression including dose reduction. Our experience suggests that SB in pediatric LT is safe, offers valuable information about subclinical rejection episodes, and can guide management of immunosuppression, including minimization. Improved outcomes with SB were likely multifactorial, potentially relating to a more favorable early posttransplant course and possible effect of management optimization through SB. Further multicenter studies are needed to examine the role of SBs on long-term outcomes in pediatric LT.

Background. An early and accurate diagnosis of liver antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) followed by timely intervention is important for clinical management but remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of late acute AMR in pediatric liver transplantation recipients. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 739 ABO-identical/compatible allograft liver biopsies from 199 pediatric transplantation recipients. Results. Based on Banff 2016 AMR criteria, 3 recipients fulfilled the criteria for definite for late acute AMR, 2 met the criteria for suspicious for AMR, and 2 were indeterminate for AMR. We further assessed the clinicopathologic characteristics of these 7 patients. All 7 patients had at least 1 biopsy with a histopathologic pattern compatible with acute AMR. Additionally, we observed accompanied moderately to markedly dilated portal/central veins and endothelialitis disproportionate to the degree of bile duct injury in all 7 patients; periportal/perivenular hepatocyte necrosis was seen in 6 of 7 patients; and arteritis was seen in 3 of 7 patients. In each case, microvascular C4d deposition was present in at least 1 biopsy. Posttransplant donor specific anti-HLA antibodies were detected in 5 patients. Two of 7 patients were retransplanted, and 2 died after developing refractory AMR. The remaining 5 patients were alive with stable graft function at a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Conclusions. Our data suggest that acute AMR in pediatric liver grafts is rare, can develop late, and may be associated with graft loss or patient death. The recurrent histopathologic findings of moderately to markedly dilated portal/central veins and endothelialitis disproportionate to the degree of bile duct injury are features that appear unique to pediatric acute AMR of liver grafts.

Background Pediatric liver transplant (LT) recipients of maternal living liver donor (LLD) grafts have been reported to experience fewer rejection episodes. However, it is unclear whether this benefit translates to reduction in developing donor‐specific antibody (DSA) among maternal‐LLD recipients. The aim of this study was to compare immunologic outcomes among maternal‐LLD, non‐maternal‐LLD, and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) recipients. Methods Children (≤18 years) who underwent LT between 1/1998 and 12/2019 at two high‐volume LT centers in North America were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups by type of graft received (maternal‐LLD, non‐maternal LLD, and DDLT). Clinical variables and outcomes were compared according to each graft type. Results A total of 450 pediatric primary LT were analyzed: 275 (61.1%) DDLT, 73 (16.2%) maternal‐LLD, and 102 (22.6%) non‐maternal‐LLD. Children receiving LLD grafts were less likely to develop rejection when compared to the DDLT group (DDLT 46.9% vs. maternal‐LLD 31.5% vs. non‐maternal‐LLD 28.4%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in rejection rates between maternal and non‐maternal‐LLD recipients. A higher percentage of maternal‐LLD recipients were on immunosuppression monotherapy compared to non‐maternal‐LLD and DDLT recipients (6.7% vs. 1.2 vs. 2.4%, respectively). A subgroup of 68 patients were tested for DSA post‐LT. Maternal‐LLD recipients were less likely to develop de novo DSA (maternal‐LLD 11.8% vs. non‐maternal‐LLD 19.3% vs. DDLT 43%, p = 0.018). None of the maternal‐LLD recipients developed antibody‐mediated rejection. Conclusions These data support the concept of immunologic benefit of maternal‐LLD in pediatric LT, with lower rates of rejection and allosensitization post‐LT when compared to DDLT recipients.

Allograft rejection is a frequent complication following solid organ transplantation, but defining specific immune subsets mediating alloimmunity has been elusive due to the scarcity of tissue in clinical biopsy specimens. Single cell techniques have emerged as valuable tools for studying mechanisms of disease in complex tissue microenvironments. Here, we developed a highly multiplexed imaging mass cytometry panel, single cell analysis pipeline, and semi-supervised immune cell clustering algorithm to study archival biopsy specimens from 79 liver transplant (LT) recipients with histopathological diagnoses of either no rejection (NR), acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), or chronic rejection (CR). This approach generated a spatially resolved proteomic atlas of 461,816 cells derived from 98 pathologist-selected regions of interest relevant to clinical diagnosis of rejection. We identified 41 distinct cell populations (32 immune and 9 parenchymal cell phenotypes) that defined key elements of the alloimmune microenvironment (AME), identified significant cell-cell interactions, and established higher order cellular neighborhoods. Our analysis revealed that both regulatory (HLA-DR+ Treg) and exhausted T-cell phenotypes (PD1+CD4+ and PD1+CD8+ T-cells), combined with variations in M2 macrophage polarization, were a unique signature of TCMR. TCMR was further characterized by alterations in cell-to-cell interactions among both exhausted immune subsets and inflammatory populations, with expansion of a CD8 enriched cellular neighborhood comprised of Treg, exhausted T-cell subsets, proliferating CD8+ T-cells, and cytotoxic T-cells. These data enabled creation of a predictive model of clinical outcomes using a subset of cell types to differentiate TCMR from NR (AUC = 0.96 ± 0.04) and TCMR from CR (AUC = 0.96 ± 0.06) with high sensitivity and specificity. Collectively, these data provide mechanistic insights into the AME in clinical LT, including a substantial role for immune exhaustion in TCMR with identification of novel targets for more focused immunotherapy in allograft rejection. Our study also offers a conceptual framework for applying spatial proteomics to study immunological diseases in archival clinical specimens.

No abstract