Escherichia coli DNA photolyase and cryptochrome 1 isolated from Vibrio cholerae, a member of the CRY-DASH family, are directly compared using a variety of experimental methods including UV-vis and Raman spectroscopy, reduction potential measurements, and isothermal titration calorimetry. The semiquinone form of the cryptochrome has an absorption spectrum that is red-shifted from that of the photolyase, but the Raman spectrum indicates that the FAD binding pocket is similar to that of photolyase. The FADH(-)/FADH* reduction potential of the cryptochrome is significantly higher than that of the photolyase at 164 mV vs NHE, but it also increases upon substrate binding (to 195 mV vs NHE), an increase similar to what is observed in photolyase. The FADH(-)/FADH* reduction potential for both proteins was found to be insensitive to ATP binding. Isothermal titration calorimetry found that photolyase binds tighter to substrate (K(A) approximately 10(5) M(-1) for photolyase and approximately 10(4) M(-1) for cryptochrome 1), and the binding constants for both proteins were slightly sensitive to oxidation state. Based upon this work, it appears that this cryptochrome has significant spectroscopic and electrochemical similarities to CPD photolyase. The thermodynamic cycle of the enzymatic repair in the context of this work is discussed.

Proton-coupled electron-transfer (PCET) is a mechanism of great importance in protein electron transfer and enzyme catalysis, and the involvement of aromatic amino acids in this process is of much interest. The DNA repair enzyme photolyase provides a natural system that allows for the study of PCET using a neutral radical tryptophan (Trp(•)). In Escherichia coli photolyase, photoreduction of the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) cofactor in its neutral radical semiquinone form (FADH(•)) results in the formation of FADH(-) and (306)Trp(•). Charge recombination between these two intermediates requires the uptake of a proton by (306)Trp(•). The rate constant of charge recombination has been measured as a function of temperature in the pH range from 5.5 to 10.0, and the data are analyzed with both classical Marcus and semi-classical Hopfield electron transfer theory. The reorganization energy associated with the charge recombination process shows a pH dependence ranging from 2.3 eV at pH ≤ 7 and 1.2 eV at pH(D) 10.0. These findings indicate that at least two mechanisms are involved in the charge recombination reaction. Global analysis of the data supports the hypothesis that PCET during charge recombination can follow two different mechanisms with an apparent switch around pH 6.5. At lower pH, concerted electron proton transfer (CEPT) is the favorable mechanism with a reorganization energy of 2.1-2.3 eV. At higher pH, a sequential mechanism becomes dominant with rate-limiting electron-transfer followed by proton uptake which has a reorganization energy of 1.0-1.3 eV. The observed 'inverse' deuterium isotope effect at pH < 8 can be explained by a solvent isotope effect that affects the free energy change of the reaction and masks the normal, mass-related kinetic isotope effect that is expected for a CEPT mechanism. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a switch in PCET mechanism has been observed in a protein.

No abstract

No abstract