Sertoli cell preparations isolated from lO-day-old rats were cultured on three different substrates: plastic, a matrix deposited by co-culture of Sertoli and peritubular myoid cells, and a reconstituted basement membrane gel from the EHS tumor. When grown on plastic, Sertoli cells formed a squamous monolayer that did not retain contaminating germ cells. Grown on the matrix deposited by Sertoli-myoid cell co-cultures, Sertoli cells were more cuboidal and supported some germ cells but did not allow them to differentiate. After 3 wk however, the Sertoli cells flattened to resemble those grown on plastic. In contrast, the Sertoli cells grown on top of the reconstituted basement membrane formed polarized monolayers virtually identical to Sertoli cells in vivo. They were columnar with an elaborate cytoskeleton. In addition, they had characteristic basally located tight junctions and maintained germ cells for at least 5 wk in the basal aspect of the monolayer. However, germ cells did not differentiate. Total protein, androgen binding protein, transferrin, and type I collagen secretion were markedly greater when Sertoli cells were grown on the extracellular matrices than when they were grown on plastic.When Sertoli cells were cultured within rather than on top of reconstituted basement membrane gels they reorganized into cords. After one week, tight junctional complexes formed between adjacent Sertoli cells, functionally compartmentalizing the cords into central (adluminal) and peripheral (basal) compartments. Germ cells within the cords continued to differentiate.Thus, Sertoli cells cultured on top of extracellular matrix components assume a phenotype and morphology more characteristic of the in vivo, differentiated cells. Growing Sertoli cells within reconstituted basement membrane gels induces a morphogenesis of the cells into cords, which closely resemble the organ from which the cells were dissociated and which provide an environment permissive for germ cell differentiation.

Molecular chaperones mediate multiple aspects of steroid receptor function, but the physiological importance of most receptor-associated cochaperones has not been determined. To help fill this gap, we targeted for disruption the mouse gene for the 52-kDa FK506 binding protein, FKBP52, a 90-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90)-binding immunophilin found in steroid receptor complexes. A mouse line lacking FKBP52 (52KO) was generated and characterized. Male 52KO mice have several defects in reproductive tissues consistent with androgen insensitivity; among these defects are ambiguous external genitalia and dysgenic prostate. FKBP52 and androgen receptor (AR) are coexpressed in prostate epithelial cells of wild-type mice. However, FKBP52 and AR are similarly coexpressed in testis even though testis morphology and spermatogenesis in 52KO males are usually normal. Molecular studies confirm that FKBP52 is a component of AR complexes, and cellular studies in yeast and human cell models demonstrate that FKBP52 can enhance AR-mediated transactivation. AR enhancement requires FKBP52 peptidylprolyl isomerase activity as well as Hsp90-binding ability, and enhancement probably relates to an affect of FKBP52 on AR-folding pathways. In the presence of FKBP52, but not other cochaperones, the function of a minimally active AR point mutant can be dramatically restored. We conclude that FKBP52 is an AR folding factor that has critically important physiological roles in some male reproductive tissues.

Previous studies demonstrated that the polypeptide diazepam binding inhibitor (DBI) and its receptor, the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor (PBR), are involved in the regulation of steroid biosynthesis and that one site of PBR action resides in mitochondria. In the present investigation, evidence is presented that a functional form of PBR is also present at the cell surface. First, PBR was immunolocalized in the rat testis using biotin-streptavidin peroxidase immunocytochemistry, and results revealed that PBR was present exclusively in the interstitial Leydig cells. Next, the distribution of PBR in MA-10 Leydig cells was further examined using confocal microscopy. MA-10 cells were either fixed and immunostained or fixed/permeabilized and immunostained for PBR, followed by generation of confocal microscope optical sections, three-dimensional reconstructions of these sections, and then generation of vertical confocal sections of the three-dimensional reconstruction. In the fixed/unpermeabilized cells, PBR immunostaining at the cell surface was clearly evident, whereas in the fixed/permeabilized cells, intracellular PBR distribution was more robust. These results suggest that the plasma membrane fraction of the receptor could mediate the action of extracellular PBR ligands on Leydig cell function. Next, we examined whether DBI, the naturally occurring PBR ligand, is secreted by testicular cells and whether it could activate the cell surface PBR. Immunolocalization of DBI demonstrated that it was present in both Leydig and Sertoli cells. Further, using an immunoblot assay, we demonstrated that DBI is present in rat testicular interstitial fluid. Metabolic labeling of cultured immature rat Sertoli cells and MA-10 mouse tumor Leydig cells, followed by immunoprecipitation of the secreted proteins with an anti-DBI antiserum, demonstrated that both Leydig and Sertoli cells secrete DBI and could serve as a cell source for the interstitial fluid DBI. Then, we partially purified the DBI present in conditioned medium and interstitial fluid by reverse phase chromatography and demonstrated it to be bioactive, based on displacement of a radiolabeled benzodiazepine (Ro5-4864)-specific ligand for PBR; pronase treatment of different preparations eliminated all bioactivity. We then examined the effects of DBI on Leydig cell function. DBI added to MA-10 cells affected DNA synthesis and cell growth in a biphasic manner; at low concentrations (1 nM), DBI was mitogenic, increasing [3H]thymidine incorporation and cell numbers by 30-40%, while at high concentrations (1 microM), DBI inhibited cell growth (30-40%). Similar effects on cell growth were obtained using the benzodiazepine Ro5-4864.

The distribution of the androgen receptor (AR) in the adult rat testis was determined by biotin-streptavidin immunoperoxidase, employing tissue embedded in polyester wax which preserves antigenicity without compromising tissue preservation. The antibody probe used, which has been characterized previously, was an affinity purified, rabbit polyclonal antibody raised to the amino terminus peptide of the rat AR. Within the interstitial compartment, AR immunostaining was detected in some Leydig cells and all smooth muscle cells forming the walls of blood vessels, but endothelial cells of blood vessels were negative. Furthermore, in those Leydig cells that were clearly identified as exhibiting AR immunostaining, the intensity of the reaction varied. In the seminiferous tubules AR immunostaining was observed in all peritubular myoid cell nuclei, but not in the distal layer of lymphatic endothelial cells. In Sertoli cells, nuclear AR immunostaining was stage specific. Moderate AR immunostaining first became evident at late stage IV or early stage V of the cycle, reached a robust peak at stages VII-VIII, and then disappeared completely. Specific AR immunostaining was also discerned in the nuclei of stage XI elongated spermatids, the spermatids in which nuclear elongation is apparent but chromatin condensation has not yet begun. Next, with onset of chromatin condensation, nuclear AR immunostaining in elongated spermatids was not discerned concomitant with its detection in the cytoplasm of the germ cells. These results are interpreted in the following manner: 1) The presence of AR in Leydig cells is consistent with the hypothesis that androgens modify Leydig cell activity in an autocrine fashion. Further, that not all Leydig cells exhibited AR immunostaining at steady state suggests a differential, functional activity of these cells within the population. 2) The intense AR immunostaining of smooth muscle cells present in the interstitium indicates that these cells are targets for androgens. 3) AR immunoreactivity in both Sertoli and peritubular myoid cells suggests their involvement in the androgenic control of spermatogenesis. The stage specific AR immunoreactivity in Sertoli cells, however, may be more indicative of a specific androgen response during these stages, whereas peritubular cells may participate in the tonal maintenance of spermatogenesis. 4) The specific presence of AR in step 11 elongated spermatids may suggest that androgens can act directly on germ cells to regulate spermatogenesis.

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is a new method used to select and procure cell clusters from tissue sections. Once captured, the DNA, RNA or protein can be easily extracted from the isolated cells and analyzed by conventional PCR, reverse transcription (RT)-PCR or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, including protein zymography for specific macromolecular changes. In LCM, a thermoplastic polymer coating [ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA)] attached to a rigid support is placed in contact with a tissue section. The EVA polymer over microscopically selected cell clusters is precisely activated by a near-infrared laser pulse and then bonds to the targeted area. Removal of the EVA and its support from the tissue section procures the selected cell aggregates for molecular analysis. This initial NIH LCM approach using a flat transfer EVA film has been recently commercialized and has proven to be an effective routine microdissection technique for subsequent macromolecular analysis in many laboratories around the world. However, reliable and precise capture of individual cells from tissue sections has been difficult to perform with the current LCM instruments. In this report, we describe the capture of individual cells with a new NIH LCM microscope, which epi-irradiates the EVA polymer overlying individual cells with 1-ms laser pulses focused to 6 microns. A computer-controlled arm precisely positions a 40-micron-wide strip of a cylindrical EVA surface onto a sample with a light contact force (ca. 0.1 g). The small contact force and contact area on the film on the sample diminishes nonspecific transfer to negligible levels. By slightly rotating the cylinder to provide a renewable transfer surface, concentration of a distinct cell type on a single cylinder is possible. Using this novel adaptation, we demonstrate the rapid and practical capture of single cells from different types of tissue sections, including immunostained cells.