No abstract

No abstract

A Two-stage Size Selective Inlet for use with hi-vol samplers was designed and tested. The inlet, which operates at a flow rate of 1.13 mVmin, is shown to have a cutpoint of 9.8 ftm and a fractionation curve slope of 1.45. The cutpoint is well within the EPA suggested limits of 10 ± 1 fim. Fractionation is not affected by wind speed over the test range of 2-24 km/h. Re-entrainment or bounce of solid particles is not of consequence. The difference in penetration of 20 jum aerodynamic diameter glass beads and liquid aerosols is less than 1 % at all wind speeds.

The Emirates Mars Mission Emirates Mars Infrared Spectrometer (EMIRS) will provide remote measurements of the martian surface and lower atmosphere in order to better characterize the geographic and diurnal variability of key constituents (water ice, water vapor, and dust) along with temperature profiles on sub-seasonal timescales. EMIRS is a FTIR spectrometer covering the range from 6.0-100+ μm (1666-100 cm−1) with a spectral sampling as high as 5 cm−1 and a 5.4-mrad IFOV and a 32.5×32.5 mrad FOV. The EMIRS optical path includes a flat 45° pointing mirror to enable one degree of freedom and has a +/- 60° clear aperture around the nadir position which is fed to a 17.78-cm diameter Cassegrain telescope. The collected light is then fed to a flat-plate based Michelson moving mirror mounted on a dual linear voice-coil motor assembly. An array of deuterated L-alanine doped triglycine sulfate (DLaTGS) pyroelectric detectors are used to sample the interferogram every 2 or 4 seconds (depending on the spectral sampling selected). A single 0.846 μm laser diode is used in a metrology interferometer to provide interferometer positional control, sampled at 40 kHz (controlled at 5 kHz) and infrared signal sampled at 625 Hz. The EMIRS beamsplitter is a 60-mm diameter, 1-mm thick 1-arcsecond wedged chemical vapor deposited diamond with an antireflection microstructure to minimize first surface reflection. EMIRS relies on an instrumented internal v-groove blackbody target for a full-aperture radiometric calibration. The radiometric precision of a single spectrum (in 5 cm−1 mode) is <3.0×10−8 W cm−2 sr−1/cm−1 between 300 and 1350 cm−1 over instrument operational temperatures (<∼0.5 K NE$\Delta $ Δ T @ 250 K). The absolute integrated radiance error is < 2% for scene temperatures ranging from 200-340 K. The overall EMIRS envelope size is 52.9×37.5×34.6 cm and the mass is 14.72 kg including the interface adapter plate. The average operational power consumption is 22.2 W, and the standby power consumption is 18.6 W with a 5.7 W thermostatically limited, always-on operational heater. EMIRS was developed by Arizona State University and Northern Arizona University in collaboration with the Mohammed bin Rashid Space Centre with Arizona Space Technologies developing the electronics. EMIRS was integrated, tested and radiometrically calibrated at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.

No abstract

Continuous air monitor (CAM) samplers are used to detect radioactive aerosol particles in nuclear facilities and to provide alarm signals should the concentrations exceed a multiple of the derived air concentration (DAC) of the radionuclide of concern in a set amount of time. Aerosol particles are drawn into a CAM sampler where collection is to take place upon a filter. Radioactivity of the particles is determined with a detector that is placed in close proximity to the filter face. An important determinant of CAM performance is the ability of the inlet and body of the CAM to transport particulate matter in the inhalable-size range (less than or equal to 10 microns aerodynamic diameter) to the filter without substantial loss or bias with respect to particulate size. Three types of CAM samplers were tested in a low-velocity aerosol wind tunnel to determine the degree to which particles penetrate through the flow systems to the collection filter under conditions typical of normal room air exchange rates. Two air velocities were used: 0.3 and 1.0 m s-1. The CAM samplers were primarily operated at a flow rate of 56.6 L min-1, although some tests were conducted at a flow rate of 28.3 L min-1. The CAM units were prototypes manufactured by Kurz Instruments, Eberline Instrument Corporation, and Victoreen Inc. These three units represent three different approaches to CAM head design. At an air speed of 1 m s-1, aerosol penetration to the filters of the Kurz unit was essentially 100% for particle sizes of 3 and 7-microns aerodynamic diameter and was 86% for a size of 15 microns. For the Eberline sampler, the penetration was over 80% for 3-microns particles but was reduced to less than 2% for 7-microns particles. The victoreen sampler showed penetration values of 98% for 3-microns aerodynamic diameter particles, 88% for 7-microns particles and 4% for a size of 15 microns. Air speed had little effect on the penetration results for the two speeds which were tested. Tests were conducted to determine the uniformity of deposits on the filters of the CAM samplers. For a particle size of 10 microns, the deposits were nonuniform for all three of the instruments.

No abstract

Numerical predictions were made of aerosol penetration through a model transport system. A physical model of the system was constructed and tested in an aerosol wind tunnel to obtain comparative data. The system was 26.6 mm in diameter and consisted of an inlet and three straight sections (oriented horizontally, vertically, and at 45°). Particle sizes covered a range in which losses were primarily caused by inertial and gravitational effects [3-25Atm aerodynamic equivalent diameter (AED)]. Tests were conducted at two flow rates (70 and 130 L/min) and two inlet orientations (parallel and perpendicular to the free stream). Wind speed was 3 m/s for all test cases. The cut points for aerosol penetration through the experimental model vis-a-vis the numerical results are as follows: At a flow rate of 70 L/min with the inlet at 0°, the experimentally observed cut point was 16.2 µ AED while the numerically predicted value was 18.2 µ AED. At 130 L/min and 0°, the experimental cut point was 12.8 µ AED as compared with a numerically value of 13.7 µ AED. At 70 L/min and a 90°inlet orientation, the experimental and numerical cutpoints were 11.2 and 11.6 µ AED, respectively; and, at 130 L/min and 90°, the experimental cut point was 12.0 µ AED while the numerically calculated value was 11.1 µ AED. Slopes of the experimental penetration curves are somewhat steeper than the numerically predicted counterparts.