No abstract

No abstract

U p to 20% of health care personnel (HCP) were found to be infected with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) 1 in the outbreak in northern Italy. 2 Recommendations on patient and HCP protection have been made, such as postponing procedures, triage, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and creation of differentiated in-hospital pathways. 3,4 However, several barriers against the adoption of these strategies exist, including cultural factors and shortages of medical resources; therefore, there are few reports of real-world experiences and outcomes with their adoption. 5 The aim of this survey was to investigate the burden of COVID-19 on endoscopic activity in a high-risk area of COVID-19 outbreak, approaches to evaluating patients, adoption and compliance of HCP with protective measures, and initial possible viral transmission outcomes from endoscopy units within a large, community-based setting (both between patients and HCP and between HCP). MethodsThe study was conducted as a survey between March 16 and March 21, 2020. Directors of emergency departments in highrisk areas of northern Italy (Supplementary Figure 1) were invited by e-mail to complete a questionnaire (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Participation was voluntary. Additional methodology is provided in the Supplementary Material. Results Characteristics of the Endoscopy UnitsA total of 42 endoscopy units were invited, of which 41 participated (97.6%). Most respondents (n ¼ 37, 90.2%) were from high-volume endoscopy units, for a total of 968 endoscopy personnel, including 323 endoscopists, 496 nurses, and 149 health care assistants. Changes in Endoscopy Activity Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019All endoscopy units had patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in their hospital. All but 1 center (40/41, 97.6%) reduced Infection Prevention and Control Measures for Coronavirus Disease 2019Regarding the preventive measures taken after the first Italian case (February 18, 2020), 5 (12.2%) endoscopy units did not take any measures, 29 (70.7%) endoscopy units adopted a triage for risk stratification of COVID-19 infection, 7 (17.1%) endoscopy units decreased endoscopic See editorial on page 36.

RCTs that investigated the issue of timing of the precut procedure were limited. Current evidence suggests that in experienced hands the early implementation of precut and persistent cannulation attempts have similar overall cannulation rates; early precut implementation reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis risk but not the overall complication rate. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

This meta-analysis shows that the wire-guided technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the standard contrast-injection method. Further large, well-performed, randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

The continued need to develop less invasive alternatives to surgical and radiologic interventions has driven the development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatments. These include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, EUS-guided necrosectomy, EUS-guided cholangiography and biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatography and pancreatic duct drainage, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage, EUS-guided drainage of abdominal and pelvic fluid collections, EUS-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis, EUS-guided pancreatic cyst ablation, EUS-guided vascular interventions, EUS-guided delivery of antitumoral agents and EUS-guided fiducial placement and brachytherapy. However these procedures are technically challenging and require expertise in both EUS and interventional endoscopy, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and gastrointestinal stenting. We undertook a systematic review to record the entire body of literature accumulated over the past 2 decades on EUS-guided interventions with the objective of performing a critical appraisal of published articles, based on the classification of studies according to levels of evidence, in order to assess the scientific progress made in this field.

This report contains clinically oriented guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms in patients fit for treatment. The statements were elaborated by working groups of experts by searching and analysing the literature, and then underwent a consensus process using a modified Delphi procedure. The statements report recommendations regarding the most appropriate use and timing of various imaging techniques and of endoscopic ultrasound, the role of circulating and intracystic markers and the pathologic evaluation for the diagnosis and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.

EUS-TTNB with micro-forceps in PCL is feasible, safe, and has a high diagnostic yield. Future prospective studies are needed to better assess the clinical impact of EUS-TTNB on the management of PCL.