AimsDevice replacement at the time of battery depletion of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) may carry a considerable risk of complications and engenders costs for healthcare systems. Therefore, ICD device longevity is extremely important both from a clinical and economic standpoint. Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) battery longevity is shorter than ICDs. We determined the rate of replacements for battery depletion and we identified possible determinants of early depletion in a series of patients who had undergone implantation of CRT-D devices.Methods and resultsWe retrieved data on 1726 consecutive CRT-D systems implanted from January 2008 to March 2010 in nine centres. Five years after a successful CRT-D implantation procedure, 46% of devices were replaced due to battery depletion. The time to device replacement for battery depletion differed considerably among currently available CRT-D systems from different manufacturers, with rates of batteries still in service at 5 years ranging from 52 to 88% (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Left ventricular lead output and unipolar pacing configuration were independent determinants of early depletion [hazard ratio (HR): 1.96; 95% 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57–2.46; P < 0.001 and HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.25–2.01; P < 0.001, respectively]. The implantation of a recent-generation device (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.45–0.72; P < 0.001), the battery chemistry and the CRT-D manufacturer (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47–0.89; P = 0.008) were additional factors associated with replacement for battery depletion.ConclusionThe device longevity at 5 years was 54%. High left ventricular lead output and unipolar pacing configuration were associated with early battery depletion, while recent-generation CRT-Ds displayed better longevity. Significant differences emerged among currently available CRT-D systems from different manufacturers.

Principal component analysis provides a better quantitative assessment of the complexity of repolarization than other ECG measurements. When applied to ARVD patients, principal component analysis of the ST-T waves recorded from the entire chest surface revealed abnormalities not detected by conventional ECG that can be considered indexes of arrhythmia vulnerability.

Heart failure patients with ventricular conduction disturbance and permanent AF treated with CRT showed large and sustained long-term (up to 4 year) improvements of left ventricular function and functional capacity, similar to patients in SR, only if AVJ ablation was performed.

The flecainide test is widely used in Brugada syndrome. However, its reproducibility and safety remain ill-defined. This study included 22 patients (18 men, mean age 34 years). Mutations in the SCN5A gene were found in eight patients. Two patients had aborted sudden cardiac death, 8 had syncope/presyncope, and 12 were asymptomatic. The ECG was diagnostic in 19 patients and suggestive in 3. At baseline, 21 of 22 patients underwent a flecainide test (2 mg/kg IV bolus over 10 minutes). In 21 of 21 patients the test was diagnostic or amplified the typical ECG pattern. At the end of drug infusion, sustained VT lasting 7-10 minutes developed in two patients. A second flecainide test was performed within 2 months in 20 patients. The test was not repeated in the two patients with prior development of VT. The flecainide test was diagnostic in 20 of 20 patients. Sustained VT occurred in one patient and recurrent VF in another. The reproducibility of the flecainide test was 100%. In 4 (18%) of 22 patients major VAs were documented after the end of flecainide infusion. VA occurred in 3 (43%) of 7 patients with, versus 1 (7%) 15 without SCN5A gene mutation (P < 0.05). No diagnostic ECG changes or arrhythmias developed in 25 control patients without structural heart disease who underwent the same study protocol. This study shows a high flecainide reproducibility, supporting its diagnostic value in Brugada syndrome. However, the occurrence of major VA, significantly higher in patients with documented SCN5A gene mutation, including in asymptomatic patients, mandates the performance under appropriate medical supervision. Whether a slower rate of drug infusion can lower the risk of VA induction, while maintaining the sensitivity of the test should be explored.