With the increasing recognition of the role of type 2 immune responses in chronic rhinosinusitis, its severity, recurrence, and comorbidities, several biologics targeting IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 as well as IgE have been administered in small proof-of-concept studies. Recently, the first phase 3 trials have been reported with dupilumab, an IL-4 receptor antagonist, demonstrating a significant and clinically relevant reduction of the disease burden from polyp size and sinus involvement to symptoms and smell; these changes consecutively led to an important increase in quality of life. Finally, the biologic versus placebo treatment reduced the need for systemic glucocorticosteroids and sinus surgery significantly and clinically meaningfully. Dupilumab today is registered for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Europe and the United States. Within a year, 2 further phase 3 trials with omalizumab and mepolizumab will be reported. With this development, without any doubt, a new era for the treatment of severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps has begun. Questions on the indication of the biologics, the selection of patients, and finally criteria for monitoring the efficacy in individual patients need to be urgently answered, and care pathways need to be established integrating the current standard of care including surgery.
Background: Local and systemic corticosteroids have long been the workhorse in management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), although there is no universally accepted modality of prescription. We carried out a survey in Italy to capture current trends in the use of topical and systemic corticosteroids in patients with CRSwNP. Methods: A survey was set up on Survey Monkey®. Each author distributed the link to the survey in an ad hoc manner and a total of 437 participants filled out the survey. Results: Mometasone furoate (79.3%) was the most frequently prescribed, administered daily by 61.9% of participants; the remaining preferred to discontinue treatment for brief periods to reduce side effects or to modulate the therapy in mild cases. The majority believe that a short cycle of systemic steroids should be prescribed for re-exacerbation of symptoms and that the number of cycles in the previous year should be evaluated to define control of the disease even if international guidelines do not provide clear indications on this topic. A certain degree of divergence emerged from responses regarding how long and the maximal dose of systemic steroids which place patients at high risk for adverse events. Finally, systemic corticosteroids seem to offer only temporary benefit on recovery of smell without guaranteeing long-term control even if the patient is adherent to topical corticosteroids. Conclusions: Our results highlight the need for clear guidelines on oral steroids, which could help supporting the use of a precision medicine approach, including indications for new biological agents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.