We report a novel NIPBL-NACC1 gene fusion in a rare primary hepatic neoplasm previously described as the “cholangioblastic variant of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.” The 2 index cases were identified within our consultation files as morphologically distinctive primary hepatic neoplasms in a 24-year-old female and a 54-year-old male. The neoplasms each demonstrated varied architecture, including trabecular, organoid, microcystic/follicular, and infiltrative glandular patterns, and biphasic cytology with large, polygonal eosinophilic cells and smaller basophilic cells. The neoplasms had a distinctive immunoprofile characterized by diffuse labeling for inhibin, and patchy labeling for neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin and synaptophysin) and biliary marker cytokeratin 19. RNA sequencing of both cases demonstrated an identical fusion of NIBPL exon 8 to NACC1 exon 2, which was further confirmed by break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for each gene. Review of a tissue microarray including 123 cases originally diagnosed as well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasm at one of our hospitals resulted in identification of a third case with similar morphology and immunophenotype in a 52-year-old male, and break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization probes confirmed rearrangement of both NIPBL and NACC1. Review of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) sequencing data and digital images from 36 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (www.cbioportal.org) revealed one additional case with the same gene fusion and the same characteristic solid, trabecular, and follicular/microcystic architectures and biphasic cytology as seen in our genetically confirmed cases. The NIPBL-NACC1 fusion represents the third type of gene fusion identified in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and correlates with a distinctive morphology described herein.

No abstract

BACKGROUND Pediatric salivary gland fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) is uncommon with a higher frequency of inflammatory lesions and a small proportion of malignancies. This international, multi‐institutional cohort evaluated the application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category. METHODS Pediatric (0‐ to 21‐year‐old) salivary gland FNA specimens from 22 international institutions of 7 countries, including the United States, England, Italy, Greece, Finland, Brazil, and France, were retrospectively assigned to an MSRSGC diagnostic category as follows: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), suspicious for malignancy (SM), or malignant. Cytology‐histology correlation was performed where available, and the ROM was calculated for each MSRSGC diagnostic category. RESULTS The cohort of 477 aspirates was reclassified according to the MSRSGC as follows: nondiagnostic, 10.3%; nonneoplastic, 34.6%; AUS, 5.2%; benign neoplasm, 27.5%; SUMP, 7.5%; SM, 2.5%; and malignant, 12.4%. Histopathologic follow‐up was available for 237 cases (49.7%). The ROMs were as follows: nondiagnostic, 5.9%; nonneoplastic, 9.1%; AUS, 35.7%; benign neoplasm, 3.3%; SUMP, 31.8%; SM, 100%; and malignant, 100%. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most common malignancy (18 of 237; 7.6%), and it was followed by acinic cell carcinoma (16 of 237; 6.8%). Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common benign neoplasm (95 of 237; 40.1%). CONCLUSIONS The MSRSGC can be reliably applied to pediatric salivary gland FNA. The ROM of each MSRSGC category in pediatric salivary gland FNA is relatively similar to the ROM of each category in adult salivary gland FNA, although the reported rates for the different MSRSGC categories are variable across institutions.

Background: Ancillary studies are commonly performed on cell blocks prepared from fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. There are limited studies in application of ancillary studies on cell blocks from salivary gland (SG) FNAs. This multi-institutional study evaluates the role of ancillary studies performed on cell blocks in the diagnosis of SG lesions, and their impact on clinical management. Method:The electronic pathology archives of three large academic institutions were searched for SG FNAs with ancillary studies performed on cell blocks. The patient demographics, FNA site, cytologic diagnosis, ancillary studies, and surgical follow-up were recorded. If needed, the cytologic diagnoses were reclassified as per the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC).