Purpose Conjunctival lymphoma represents an uncommon tumor, accounting for 5-10% of total extranodal lymphomas. Although radiotherapy is a frequent treatment option, limited capacities and lack of specialized centers are common problems in Peru, forcing radiation oncologists to apply short courses of radiotherapy. Here, we report a case series of patients treated with a novel single-shot scheme. Additionally, we present a literature review of the current short-course irradiation strategies. Cases presentation Three cases of conjunctival marginal zone (B-cell) lymphoma (marginal zone lymphoma [MZL]/mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue [MALT]) of the fornix are presented. Following biopsy and sonographic assessment of the lesion thickness, we applied a focused single dose of 14 Gy kilovoltage brachytherapy (prescribed to the maximum thickness of the lesion). Follow-up was scheduled in quarterly intervals. After 28, 31, and 40 months of follow-up, none of the three patients treated exhibited acute or chronic toxicities and remained local or distant disease-free. Conclusions Single dose kilovoltage brachytherapy was effective and safe in this small cohort of patients. Based on the literature, there is an evidence that local treatment in short-course radiotherapy is effective and should be considered amongst therapeutic options for these patients; however, this novel approach should be evaluated prospectively in a larger cohort.
To determine predictors of tumor treating field (TTFields) use and overall survival in patients receiving combined modality therapy for primary glioblastoma (GBM). Materials/Methods: Between 2015 and 2019, 65 patients underwent maximal surgical debulking, completed external beam radiotherapy with concurrent TMZ chemotherapy, and initiated adjuvant TMZ. We performed this retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis of patient, tumor, and treatment related factors to assess predictors of TTFields use and its association with overall survival. Results: Of the 65 patients, 47 were male, and the median age was 62 years (range, 34 to 87). ECOG performance status was 0 in 42 patients, 1 in 16, 2 in 5, and 3 in 2. Forty-two patients underwent gross total resection, while 14 had subtotal resection, and 9 had biopsy only. With a median follow up of 12.4 months, the median overall survival for all patients was 18 months, and the 1-year actuarial survival was 74%. The median compliance for TTFields use was 67.2% (range, 9.4 to 96%). We divided TTFields usage into 3 subgroups: 21 patients who declined to start TTFields, 28 patients with monthly usage of 1 to 75%, and 16 patients with usage greater than 75%. Of the 44 patients who elected to use TTFields, 31 were age 65 or younger, 40 had an ECOG status of 0-1, and 30 underwent gross total resection. There was a trend towards TTFields users being younger (mean age 64 vs. 59, pZ0.08), but no other associations with TTFields use were noted. Univariate analysis of factors associated with 1year survival revealed TTFields use (refused, 56% vs. usage 1-75%, 81% vs. usage >75%, 83%, pZ0.007), ECOG performance status (ECOG 3, 0% vs ECOG 2, 80% vs ECOG 1, 86%, vs ECOG 0, 60%, p<0.001), MGMT status (unmethylated, 66% vs methylated, 84%, p Z 0.012), and extent of resection (biopsy only, 40% vs. STR, 69% vs. GTR 83%, pZ0.005) as significant. On multivariate analysis TTF compliance as a continuous variable (p<0.001), MGMT status (pZ0.001), and extent of surgical resection (pZ0.001) remained significant. Conclusion: Our single institutional results confirm the randomized trial data in that TTFields use increases OS and the magnitude of the benefit is dependent upon the degree of TTFields usage. We were unable to find any factor associated with TTFields use vs. non-use even though all of our patients were eligible. We are currently investigating methods of behavioral modification to increase both TTFields use and the degree of use so that more patients benefit from TTFields therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.