The reaction of a series of cationic and neutral complexes
[(η5-Ind)Mo(CO)2L2]0,+
(1, L =
NCMe; 2, L = CNMe; 3, L = OPPh3;
4, L = OP(OMe)3; 5, L =
PMe3; 6, L2 =
(PhSCH2)2; 7,
L2 =
(O2CCF3)-; 8,
L2 =
(O2CCH3)-; 9,
L2 = (O2CPh)-;
10, L2 =
[(NPh)2CH]-; 11,
L2 = [(N-p-tolyl)2CH]-; 12,
L2 =
(S2CNEt2)-; 13,
L2 =
(S2P(OEt)2)-; 14,
L2 = acac-; 15, L2
= MeC(O)CHC(NPh)CMe) with acetonitrile produces the
ring-slipped adducts
[(η3-Ind)MoL2(NCMe)(CO)2]0,+ only in the cases where L = NCMe,
OPPh3, OP(OMe)3 or L2 =
(O2CCF3)-,
acac-.
The adducts are labile and have been characterized by means of the
distinctive chemical
shift of the central pseudo-allylic proton of the
η3-indenyl ligand. In the other cases no
ring
slippage is observed. In NCMe solvent 6 undergoes
substitution to give 1, but the macrocycle
trithiacyclononane (ttcn) reacts with 1 to give
[(η3-Ind)Mo(CO)2(κ3-ttcn)]+
as the BF4
- salt.
PMe3 reacts with 1 to give substitution
products in a stepwise fashion.
[(η5-Ind)Mo(NCMe)(PMe3)(CO)2]BF4 is formed
instantaneously at −70 °C, but 5 forms slowly at
room
temperature without any detectable ring-slipped intermediate. The
crystal structure of the
isonitrile cation 2 is presented. 2 adds
neither NCMe nor CNMe but undergoes CO
substitution with excess CNMe. Extended Hückel and density
function calculations predict
the most stable conformation of
[(η5-Ind)MoL2(CO)2]+
(L = NCR, CNR) to be the one with
the ring trans to the carbonyls, while for the
[(η3-Ind)MoL2(NCR)(CO)2]+
complexes the ring
lies over the carbonyls. According to the dft calculations,
acetonitrile addition induces η5 →
η3 slipping of the ring in the NCR derivatives but not in
the CNR analogues, because the
reaction is enthalpically driven in the former and not in the latter.
The dft calculations of
part of the reaction path indicate that the indenyl ring starts to slip
when the incoming
ligand is still far from the metal (∼400 pm), thus supporting earlier
kinetically based
proposals.