SummaryBackgroundPublic objection to autopsy has led to a search for minimally invasive alternatives. Imaging has potential, but its accuracy is unknown. We aimed to identify the accuracy of post-mortem CT and MRI compared with full autopsy in a large series of adult deaths.MethodsThis study was undertaken at two UK centres in Manchester and Oxford between April, 2006, and November, 2008. We used whole-body CT and MRI followed by full autopsy to investigate a series of adult deaths that were reported to the coroner. CT and MRI scans were reported independently, each by two radiologists who were masked to the autopsy findings. All four radiologists then produced a consensus report based on both techniques, recorded their confidence in cause of death, and identified whether autopsy was needed.FindingsWe assessed 182 unselected cases. The major discrepancy rate between cause of death identified by radiology and autopsy was 32% (95% CI 26–40) for CT, 43% (36–50) for MRI, and 30% (24–37) for the consensus radiology report; 10% (3–17) lower for CT than for MRI. Radiologists indicated that autopsy was not needed in 62 (34%; 95% CI 28–41) of 182 cases for CT reports, 76 (42%; 35–49) of 182 cases for MRI reports, and 88 (48%; 41–56) of 182 cases for consensus reports. Of these cases, the major discrepancy rate compared with autopsy was 16% (95% CI 9–27), 21% (13–32), and 16% (10–25), respectively, which is significantly lower (p<0·0001) than for cases with no definite cause of death. The most common imaging errors in identification of cause of death were ischaemic heart disease (n=27), pulmonary embolism (11), pneumonia (13), and intra-abdominal lesions (16).InterpretationWe found that, compared with traditional autopsy, CT was a more accurate imaging technique than MRI for providing a cause of death. The error rate when radiologists provided a confident cause of death was similar to that for clinical death certificates, and could therefore be acceptable for medicolegal purposes. However, common causes of sudden death are frequently missed on CT and MRI, and, unless these weaknesses are addressed, systematic errors in mortality statistics would result if imaging were to replace conventional autopsy.FundingPolicy Research Programme, Department of Health, UK.

No abstract

The results suggest that the performance advantage of expert radiologists is underpinned by superior pattern recognition skills, as evidenced by a quicker time to first fixate the pathology, and less time spent searching the image.

The median effective dose from cardiac CT with standard filtered back-projection was comparable with the effective dose from invasive coronary angiography, even with application of the most contemporary ICRP tissue weightings and use of cardiac specific volumes. Cardiac CT scanning incorporating iterative reconstruction resulted in a significant reduction in the effective dose.

In this series the short-term clinical success of subintimal angioplasty was poor because of a high incidence of reocclusion and restenosis, despite a relatively high initial technical success rate.

Image-based noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an emergent approach to determine the functional relevance of coronary stenoses. The present work aimed to determine the feasibility of using a method based on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and reduced-order models (0D-1D) for the evaluation of coronary stenoses. The reduced-order methodology (cFFR RO ) was kept as simple as possible and did not include pressure drop or stenosis models. The geometry definition was incorporated into the physical model used to solve coronary flow and pressure. cFFRRO was assessed on a virtual cohort of 30 coronary artery stenoses in 25 vessels and compared with a standard approach based on 3D computational fluid dynamics (cFFR 3D ). In this proof-of-concept study, we sought to investigate the influence of geometry and boundary conditions on the agreement between both methods. Performance on a per-vessel level showed a good correlation between both methods (Pearson's product-moment R = 0.885, P < 0.01), when using cFFR 3D as the reference standard. The 95% limits of agreement were −0.116 and 0.08, and the mean bias was −0.018 (SD = 0.05). Our results suggest no appreciable difference between cFFR RO and cFFR 3D with respect to lesion length and/or aspect ratio. At a fixed aspect ratio, however, stenosis severity and shape appeared to be the most critical factors accounting for differences in both methods. Despite the assumptions inherent to the 1D formulation, asymmetry did not seem to affect the agreement.The choice of boundary conditions is critical in obtaining a functionally significant drop in pressure. Our initial data suggest that this approach may be part of a broader risk assessment strategy aimed at increasing the diagnostic yield of cardiac catheterisation for in-hospital evaluation of haemodynamically significant stenoses. KEYWORDSboundary conditions, coronary stenosis severity, shape and asymmetry, non-invasive fractional flow reserve, reduced-order model

Objective: To assess submillimetre coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in comparison with invasive quantitative coronary angiography as the gold standard and to examine the effect of significant coronary artery calcification (CAC), which is known to impede lumen visualisation, on the accuracy of the examination. Methods: After invasive coronary angiography, 58 patients underwent coronary imaging with a GE Lightspeed 16 computed tomography (CT) system. CAC was quantified after an ECG triggered acquisition with a low tube current. Coronary CTA was performed with retrospective ECG gating and a 16 6 0.63 mm collimation and was reconstructed with an effective 65-250 ms temporal resolution. All 13 major coronary artery segments were evaluated for the presence of > 50% stenosis, and compared with the gold standard. Results: One patient moved and could not be evaluated. All segments (except occluded segments) were evaluated for 57 patients. Overall the accuracy of coronary CTA for detection of > 50% stenosis was: sensitivity 83%, specificity 97%, positive predictive value 80%, and negative predictive value 97%. The number of diseased coronary arteries was correctly diagnosed in 34 of 38 (89%) patients overall. Altogether 21 of 57 (37%) patients had a CAC score > 400, which was predefined as representing significant CAC. Excluding these patients from the analysis improved the accuracy of coronary CTA to a sensitivity of 89%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 79%, and negative predictive value 99%. Conclusions: Non-invasive coronary angiography with submillimetre CT is reliable and accurate. It appears that a subgroup of patients may be selected based on CAC score in whom the investigation has even higher accuracy. Coronary CTA has reached the stage where it should be considered for a clinical role. Further research is required to define this role.T he emergence of ECG gated multislice computed tomography (CT) has stimulated great interest among cardiologists. This is primarily because this new technology may provide a clinically useful method for performing non-invasive coronary angiography. Four slice CT has been extensively evaluated in this context and is lacking in both reliability of image quality and accuracy of results. [1][2][3][4][5] However, these studies have identified certain patient related factors that appear to affect the provision of a clear image of the contrast enhanced coronary artery lumen. Specifically, high heart rates induce motion artefact and excessive coronary artery calcification (CAC) impedes accurate lumen visualisation and may produce blooming artefacts. 6 Recently four slice CT has been superseded by 16 slice CT. For cardiac applications this technology provides not only a submillimetre collimation but also improved temporal resolution. Preliminary studies have been performed with this type of technology.7-9 Although the results of these studies have been favourably received, improvements are still needed before clinical use. 10

ABSTRACT. Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) with its high spatial and temporal resolution has now become an established and complementary method for cardiac imaging. It can now be used reliably to exclude significant coronary artery disease and delineate complex coronary artery anomalies, and has become a valuable problem-solving tool. Our experience with MDCT imaging suggests that it is clinically useful for imaging the pericardium. It is important to be aware of the normal anatomy of the pericardium and not mistake normal variations for pathology. The pericardial recesses are visible in up to 44% of non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated MDCT images. Abnormalities of the pericardium can now be identified with increasing certainty on 64-detector row CT; they may be the key to diagnosis and therefore must not be overlooked. This educational review of the pericardium will cover different imaging techniques, with a significant emphasis on MDCT. We have a large research and clinical experience of ECG-gated cardiac CT and will demonstrate examples of pericardial recesses, their variations and a wide variety of pericardial abnormalities and systemic conditions affecting the pericardium. We give a brief relevant background of the conditions and reinforce the key imaging features. We aim to provide a pictorial demonstration of the wide variety of abnormalities of the pericardium and the pitfalls in the diagnosis of pericardial disease.