Amaç: Fornier gangreninin tedavisi, agresif yara debridmanı, geniş spektrumlu antibiyotik kullanımı, yara bakımı ve gerekirse tekrar debridman gerektirir. Çalışmamızın amacı Fornier gangrenli hastaların tedavisinde klasik yara bakımının ve vakum yardımlı kapama malzemelerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya Fornier gangreni nedeniyle cerrahi yapılan otuz üç hasta (29 erkek ve 4 kadın) dahil edildi. Veriler retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hataların 23 tanesi (%69,7) Diyabet hastalığı vardı ve 20 hastada (%60) kötü hijyen mevcuttu. Hastalar debridman sonrası yara bakımına göre 2 gruba ayırıldı. On dört hastaya antibiyotikli pomad ile günde 2 kez standart yara pansumanı yapıldı. On yedi hasta, 48-72 saatte bir değişen VAC tedavisi ile takip edildi. İki grubun verileri karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 23 tanesi (%69,7) Diyabet hastalığı vardı ve 20 hastada (%60) kötü hijyen mevcuttu. Klasik pansuman ile takip edilen hastalarda tekrar debridman oranları VAC ile takip edilen hastalara göre istatistiksel olarak fazlaydı (p=0,016). Mortalite oranları, hastanede yatış süreleri ve Öz Objective: Management of Fournier's gangrene (FG) includes large wound debridement, broad-spectrum antibiotic, wound care and re-debridement if necessary. The aim of our study was to compare standard open wound care and vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in patients with FG. Materials and Methods: Thirty-three patients (29 males and 4 females) who underwent surgery for FG were enrolled in the present study. The data was evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to wound care after large wound debridement. Standard open wound care with antibiotic pomade was performed twice a day in 14 patients and VAC therapy was performed every 48-72 hours in 17 patients. The data of the two groups were compared. Results: Twenty-three (69.7%) patients had Diabetes Mellitus and 20 patients (60%) had poor hygiene. The re-debridement rate in patients who received standard open wound care was statistically higher than in those who underwent VAC therapy (p=0.016). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality rate, length of hospital stay and need for reconstruction between the groups. When the data were analyzed, no statistically significant difference was found in FG Severity index score, length of hospital stay and mortality rate. However, the relationship between mortality rate and location of lesion was statistically significant (p=0.03). Four patients died, 3 (75%) due to wide necrotizing fasciitis extending to the abdominal wall. Conclusion: The present study showed that the technique used for wound care did not influence mortality, need for reconstruction and length of hospital stay. The only advantage of VAC therapy was decreased re-debridement rate in patients with FG.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.