Background
Recent studies suggest that delayed cord clamping (DCC) is advantageous for achieving hemodynamic stability and improving oxygenation compared to the immediate cord clamping (ICC) during fetal-to-neonatal transition yet there is no quantitative information on hemodynamics and respiration, particularly for pre-term babies and fetal disease states. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate the effects of ICC and DCC on hemodynamics and respiration of the newborn preterm infants in the presence of common vascular pathologies.
Methods
A computational lumped parameter model (LPM) of the placental and respiratory system of a fetus is developed to predict blood pressure, flow rates and oxygen saturation. Cardiovascular system at different gestational ages (GA) are modeled using scaling relations governing fetal growth with the LPM. Intrauterine growth restriction (GR), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were modeled for a newborn at 30 weeks GA. We also formulated a “severity index (
SI
)” which is a weighted measure of ICC vs. DCC based on the functional parameters derived from our model and existing neonatal disease scoring systems.
Results
Our results show that transitional hemodynamics is smoother in DCC compared to ICC for all GAs. Blood volume of the neonate increases by 10% for moderately preterm and term infants (32–40 wks) and by 15% for very and extremely preterm infants (22–30 wks) with DCC compared to ICC. DCC also improves the cardiac output and the arterial blood pressure by 17% in term (36–40 wks), by 18% in moderately preterm (32–36 wks), by 21% in very preterm (28–32 wks) and by 24% in extremely preterm (20–28 wks) births compared to the ICC. A decline in oxygen saturation is observed in ICC received infants by 20% compared to the DCC received ones. At 30 weeks GA, SI were calculated for healthy newborns (1.18), and newborns with GR (1.38), PDA (1.22) and RDS (1.2) templates.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that DCC provides superior hemodynamics and respiration at birth compared to ICC. This information will help preventing the complications associated with poor oxygenation arising in premature births and pre-screening the more critical babies in terms of their cardiovascular severity.
Objectives
We hypothesize that mechanical assistance of the pulmonary blood flow in a Norwood circulation can increase systemic blood flow and oxygen delivery. The aim of the study was to compare haemodynamics of an unassisted Norwood Blalock-Taussig shunt circulation with a mechanically assisted pulmonary flow based Norwood circulation, using a lumped parameter computational model.
Methods
A neonatal circulatory lumped parameter model was developed to simulate a Norwood circulation with a 3.5 mm Blalock-Taussig shunt in a 3.5 kg neonate. A roller pump circulatory assist device with an inflow bladder was incorporated into the Norwood circulation to mechanically support the pulmonary circulation. Computer simulations were used to compare the haemodynamics of the assisted and unassisted circulations. Assisted and unassisted models with normal (56%) and reduced ejection fraction (30%) were compared.
Results
Compared to the unassisted Norwood circulation, the systemic flow in the assisted Norwood increased by 25% (ejection fraction = 56%) and 41% (ejection fraction = 30%). The central venous pressure decreased by up to 3 mmHg (both ejection fraction = 56% and ejection fraction = 30%) at a maximum pulmonary assist flow of 800 ml/min. Initiation of assisted pulmonary flow increased the arterial oxygen saturation by up to 15% and mixed venous saturation by up to 20%.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that an assisted pulmonary flow based Norwood circulation has higher systemic flow and oxygen delivery compared to a standard Norwood Blalock-Taussig shunt circulation.
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is used as a bridge-to-heart transplantation for end-stage failing Fontan patients with single-ventricle (SV) circulation. Donor shortage and complexity of the single-ventricle circulation physiology demands novel circulatory support systems and alternative solutions. An out-of-the-box circulation concept in which the left and right ventricles are switched with each other inspired a novel bi-ventricle MCS configuration for the failing Fontan patients. In the proposed configuration, the systemic circulation is maintained by a conventional mechanical ventricle assist device while the venous circulation is delegated to the native SV. This approach spares the SV and puts it to a new use at the right-side providing the most needed venous flow pulsatility. To analyze its feasibility and performance, 8 realistic Fontan circulation scenarios have been studied via a multi-compartmental lumped parameter cardiovascular model (LPM). Model is developed specifically for simulating the SV circulation and validated against pulsatile mock-up flow loop measurements for the ideal (Fontan), failed (VD) and assisted Fontan (PVR-cmcs) scenarios. The proposed surgical configuration maintained the cardiac index (3-3.5 l/min/m 2) providing a normal mean systemic arterial pressure. For a failed SV with low ejection fraction (EF=26%), representing a typical systemic failure, proposed configuration introduced a venous/pulmonary pulsatility of ~28 mmHg and a drop of 2 mmHg in central venous pressure (CVP) with acceptable pulmonary artery pressures (17.5 mmHg). In the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) failure model, it provided approximately 5 mmHg drop in CVP with venous/pulmonary pulsatility reaching ~22 mmHg. For high PVR failure case with a healthy SV (EF = 44%) pulmonary hypertension is likely to occur, indicating a need for precise functional assessment of the failed-ventricle before it is considered for the proposed arrangement. Comprehensive in vitro and in silico results encourage this concept as an economical alternative to the conventional bi-ventricle MCS pending animal experiments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.