No abstract

Prevalence of anxiety/depression was investigated in 105 COVID‐19 patients at 1‐3 months from virological clearance by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS‐A/D). 30% of patients displayed pathological HADS‐A/D, 52.4% showed persistent symptoms. Pathological HADS‐A/D patients more commonly reported symptom persistence, even after adjustment for age, gender, disease severity. Psychological assessments should be encouraged in COVID‐19 patients’ follow‐up. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background: Mortality rate from COVID-19 in Italy is among the world’s highest. We aimed to ascertain whether there was any reduction of in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in the second-wave period (October 2020–January 2021) compared to the first one (February–May 2020); further, we verified whether there were clusters of hospitalised patients who particularly benefitted from reduced mortality rate. Methods: Data collected related to in-patients’ demographics, clinical, laboratory, therapies and outcome. Primary end-point was time to in-hospital death. Factors associated were evaluated by uni- and multivariable analyses. A flow diagram was created to determine the rate of in-hospital death according to individual and disease characteristics. Results: A total of 1561 patients were included. The 14-day cumulative incidence of in-hospital death by competing risk regression was of 24.8% (95% CI: 21.3–28.5) and 15.9% (95% CI: 13.7–18.2) in the first and second wave. We observed that the highest relative reduction of death from first to second wave (more than 47%) occurred mainly in the clusters of patients younger than 70 years. Conclusions: Progress in care and supporting therapies did affect population over 70 years to a lesser extent. Preventive and vaccination campaigns should focus on individuals whose risk of death from COVID-19 remains high.

Highlights We describe the importance of patients’s characteristics and comorbidities in the outcome of COVID-19 disease. We point out two different waves of epidemics in Lombardy, the first one in younger and the second in older patients. Careful assessment of local setting in which COVID-19 spreads is needed to forsee fatality rates and hospital engagement.

Background Despite being an uncommon cause of meningoencephalitis, West Nile virus (WNV) recently provoked significant outbreaks throughout Europe. West Nile neuroinvasive disease (WNND) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in older and compromised individuals, while its diagnosis may be demanding for the clinician. Here discussed are three cases of WNND with a focus on the diagnostic challenges they presented due to atypical clinical presentation and laboratory findings. Case presentation Between July and September 2020 three patients presented to our attention with signs and symptoms compatible with meningoencephalitis. Among routine procedures, they underwent lumbar puncture and imaging. In the absence of microbiological isolates, biological samples were sent for serology and NAATs for WNV. Following diagnosis, the patients gradually recovered and were discharged either home or to rehabilitation facilities. Conclusions The laboratory findings here discussed, in particular CSF parameters, are only partially consistent with those described in the literature, which highlights the need for further research. While serology and NAATs on blood and urine appear the most reliable techniques in the diagnostic work-up of WNND, utility of NAATs on CSF specimens is limited by the kinetics of WNV viremia in biological fluids. This report underlines that WNND should always be included in the differential diagnosis of meningoencephalitis during WNV transmission period.

A long period of isolation was observed in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in Milan over March-September 2020 (45; IQR: 37–54 days). A significantly shorter period would have been observed by the application of May-WHO (22, IQR: 17–30 days, P < 0.001) and October-Italian (26, IQR: 21–34 days, P < 0.001) Guidelines. The adoption of the new symptom-based criteria is likely to lead to a significant reduction in the length of the isolation period with potential social, economic and psychological benefits, particularly in the younger population with mild/moderate disease and no comorbidities. In our opinion, the release from isolation after 21 days from symptoms onset, even without a PCR diagnostic test, in most cases seems the most adequate strategy that could balance precautions to prevent SARS CoV-2 transmission and unnecessary prolonged isolation or overuse of diagnostic testing.