BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication fails to control the gastroesophageal reflux in almost 15% of patients, and most of them must be reoperated due to postoperative symptoms. Different surgical options have been suggested. AIMS: This study aimed to present the postoperative outcomes of patients submitted to three different procedures: redo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication alone (Group A), redo laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication combined with distal gastrectomy (Group B), or conversion to laparoscopic Toupet combined with distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (Group C). METHODS: This is a prospective study involving 77 patients who were submitted initially to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and presented recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux after the operation. They were evaluated before and after the reoperation with clinical questionnaire and objective functional studies. After reestablishing the anatomy of the esophagogastric junction, a surgery was performed. None of the patients were lost during follow-up. RESULTS: Persistent symptoms were observed more frequently in Group A or B patients, including wrap stricture, intrathoracic wrap, or twisted fundoplication. In Group C, recurrent symptoms associated with this anatomic alteration were infrequently observed. Incompetent lower esophageal sphincter was confirmed in 57.7% of patients included in Group A, compared to 17.2% after Nissen and distal gastrectomy and 26% after Toupet procedure plus distal gastrectomy. In Group C, despite the high percentage of patients with incompetent lower esophageal sphincter, 8.7% had abnormal acid reflux after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Nissen and Toupet procedures combined with Roux-en-Y distal gastrectomy are safe and effective for the management of failed Nissen fundoplication. However, Toupet technique is preferable for patients suffering from mainly dysphagia and pain.
Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication fails in almost 15% of patients and most of them must be re-operated in order to improve reflux symptoms, esophagitis, or hiatal hernia. Surgical options are to redo LNF, distal gastrectomy alone or combination of both procedures. Redoing LNF, is associated with high rate of postoperative complications and re-failure.
Purpose
To present the early and medium-term postoperative outcomes of patients submitted to Laparoscopic Toupet Fundoplication combined with Distal Gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy.
Methods
prospective study including 23 patients submitted to Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication who presented recurrence of gastroesophageal reflux after the operation. They were studied with endoscopy, barium swallow, manometry and 24 h pH monitoring in order to determine presence of esophagitis, anatomical deformities, defective Lower Esophageal Sphincter and pathologic acid reflux. Surgical process consisted on re-establishing the anatomy of the esophago-gastric junction, and then perform laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication combined with distal gastrecvtomy and Roux Y gastrojejunostomy.
Results
After surgery statistically significant improvement regarding heartburn (p < 0.0001), dysphagia (p < 0.0001) and retrosternal chest pain (p < 0.0001) as well as in the endoscopic esophagitis was observed. No significant LES pressure increase after the operation was observed. (from 7.88 + 2.7 to 10.5 + 3.36) (p = 0.15), but the abnormal acid reflux improved significantly after the reoperation, %time pH < 4 decreases from 12.00 + 6.62 to 4.3 + 4.04 (0.0004) and DeMeester score from 44.82 + 21.8 to 11.95 + 5.14 (0.0008) respectively.
Conclusion
The proposed procedure is safe option to treat successfully patients after failed Nissen fundoplication. Reflux symptoms, esophagitis, presence oh hiatal hernia and reflux score improved after the procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.