The increasing popularity of Location-Based Social Networks (LBSNs) and the semantic enrichment of mobility data in several contexts in the last few years has led to the generation of large volumes of trajectory data. In contrast to GPS-based trajectories, LBSN and context-aware trajectories are more complex data, having several semantic textual dimensions besides space and time, which may reveal interesting mobility patterns. For instance, people may visit different places or perform different activities depending on the weather conditions and their geographical location. Animals may choose their habitat based on climate and vegetation characteristics. These new semantically rich data, known as multiple-aspect trajectories, pose new challenges in trajectory classification, which is the problem that we address in this paper. Existing methods for trajectory classification cannot deal with the complexity of heterogeneous data dimensions or the sequential aspect that characterizes movement. In this paper we propose MARC, an approach based on attribute embedding and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) for classifying multiple-aspect trajectories, that tackles all trajectory properties: space, time, semantics, and sequence. We highlight that MARC exhibits good performance especially when trajectories are described by several textual/categorical attributes. Experiments performed over four publicly available datasets considering the Trajectory-User Linking (TUL) problem show that MARC outperformed all competitors in all datasets, with respect to accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

No abstract

No abstract

During the last few years the volumes of the data that synthesize trajectories have expanded to unparalleled quantities. This growth is challenging traditional trajectory analysis approaches and solutions are sought in other domains. In this work, we focus on data compression techniques with the intention to minimize the size of trajectory data, while, at the same time, minimizing the impact on the trajectory analysis methods. To this extent, we evaluate five lossy compression algorithms: Douglas-Peucker (DP), Time Ratio (TR), Speed Based (SP), Time Ratio Speed Based (TR_SP) and Speed Based Time Ratio (SP_TR). The comparison is performed using four distinct real world datasets against six different dynamically assigned thresholds. The effectiveness of the compression is evaluated using classification techniques and similarity measures. The results showed that there is a trade-off between the compression rate and the achieved quality. The is no “best algorithm” for every case and the choice of the proper compression algorithm is an application-dependent process.

No abstract