Objectives:The COVID-19 infection was declared pandemic in March 2020. Since then, multiple studies have attempted to correlate clinical factors with the risk of complications from COVID-19. However, cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and the results vary between different cohorts. Our goal is to describe a cohort of cancer patients and COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, based on a systematic review of medical records, including nine cancer centers, located in five different Brazilian cities. Patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 through RT-PCR between March 15th, 2020, and August 13th, 2020. Poisson regression models were then used to test for an association between clinical characteristics and severity of COVID-19 infections. Results: 102 patients had data collected for analysis, 85 (83.3%) of whom were hospitalized due to complications from COVID-19 infection. The median age was 65.8 years, most were female patients (61.8%) and white (73,5%). 78.4% had a performance status of 0-1, and the most common cancer subtypes were gastrointestinal (30.4%), breast (22.6%), and hematological (13.7%). Almost 40% of the population had stage IV disease. The mortality rate for all hospitalized patients was 36.5%, while that for those admitted to ICU was 68.4%. Key univariable risk factors for mortality included age (RR 1.03), ECOG = 2 (RR 1.83), hypertension (RR 1.72), lung metastasis (RR 1.67), and lymphocytes = 1000 admission (RR 2.40). At the multivariable analysis, the risk factors were also age (RR 1.02), primary lung cancer (RR 2.61), lung metastasis (RR 2.86), and coronary disease (RR 3.76). Conclusions: Despite the high mortality of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, cancer is a heterogeneous disease and some risk factors should be considered as the main responsible for the worst prognosis. Cancer patients should be carefully monitored in pandemic periods of infectious diseases and their management must be individualized.
e13600 Background: The COVID-19 infection was declared pandemic in March 2020. Since then, multiple studies have attempted to correlate clinical factors with risk of complications from COVID-19, including cancer. However, cancer patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and the results vary between different cohorts. Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study, based on systematic review of medical records, including nine cancer centers, located in five different Brazilian cities. Patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 through RT-PCR between March 15, 2020 and August 13 , 2020. Poisson regression models were then used to test for an association between clinical characteristics and severity of COVID-19 infections. Results: 102 patients had data collected for analysis, 85 (83.3%) of whom were hospitalized due to complications from COVID-19 infection. The median age was 65.8 years, most were female patients (61.8%) and white (73,5%). 78.4% had a performance status of 0-1, and the most common cancer subtypes were gastrointestinal (30.4%), breast (22.6%) and hematological (13.7%). Almost 40% of population had stage IV disease. Mortality rate for all hospitalized patients was 36.5%, while for those admitted to the ICU it was 68.4%. Key univariable risk factors for mortality included age (RR 1.03), ECOG ≥ 2 (RR 1.83), hypertension (RR 1.72), lung metastasis (RR 1.67), and lymphocytes ≤ 1000 admission (RR 2.40). At the multivariable analysis, the risk factors were also age (RR 1.02), primary lung cancer (RR 2.61), lung metastasis (RR 2.86), and coronary disease (RR 3.76). Conclusions: Despite the high mortality of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, our data are compatible with other cohorts. Cancer patients must be carefully monitored in pandemic periods of infectious diseases.
e18171 Background: The perception of symptoms, diagnosys, access to a cancer care institute and the first-line of therapy are milestones of cancer care. The success of an oncological treatment is directly relatable to these key-points and the time gaps between them. Growing research in developing countries points out the challenges of offering quality of care in this setting as social, cultural, economic and political factors are deeply intertwined. The objective of this study is to identify the key-points of cancer care, the time gaps between them and the time-related end-points of patients refered to a medical oncology department of a public university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, in the period of one year. Methods: This is a observational retrospective study based on review of medical records of all cancer patients refered to the medical oncology department of a public university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, from 01/01/17 to 12/31/17. The analysis was performed in January 2019. The data collected comprises the age at diagnosys, gender, primary tumor site, stage (AJCC 7th ed. staging system), onset of symptons, date of hystopathological diagnosys, the first therapeutic modality and when it was offered, intention of care (curative or palliative), outcomes and the following time-relations: symptoms-dyagnosis (SD), dyagnosis-treatment (DT) and symptoms-treatment (ST). Results: From 358 profiles, 275 were included. The average age at diagnosys was 58,7 years (15-88 years). Men were 147 (53,4%) and 128 (46,5%) were women. The most common primary tumor sites were gastrointestinal tract 22,9%, head and neck 20,3%, cutaneous melanoma 17,8% and genitourinary tract 16%. 160 (58,1%) patients were diagnosed at advanced/metastatic stages (III/IV). The median time-relations were: 5,5 months for SD; 2 months for DT and 8 months for ST. The first treatment offered was surgery at 63,2% of cases, radiotherapy 17,8%, systemic therapy 16,7% (endocrine therapy, targeted therapy or chemotherapy) or palliative care 1,8%. The intention of the initial treatment: 76,3% were curative and 23,2% palliative. At time of analysis, 63,6% of patients were alive, 19,2% deceased and 16,7% of unknown outcome. Conclusions: Our data endorses prevalent findings of developing countries epidemiological studies: late diagnosys, non-curative treatments and poor outcomes. Known causes are desfavorable social-economic conditions, symptom neglection, ineffective cancer screening and deficiency of public cancer care networks. We emphasize time goals as important quality indexes to guide new solutions.
e18638 Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) annual meetings as well as their GI dedicated meetings (ASCO GI and ESMO GI) have the premise to accept abstracts for oral presentations that have not been previously presented. Methods: We conducted a review of all 220 abstracts involving phase II or III trials of systemic therapies that have been presented orally from June 2019 to January 2023 at ASCO, ASCO GI, ESMO and ESMO GI meetings to evaluate the incidenceof repetitive presentations of the same trial in different meetings as well as their relationship to pharmaceutical industry sponsorship. ANOVA test was used to compare means between different groups and p values of ≤ 0.1 were considered significant. Results: Overall, 20,9% of accepted oral abstracts from phase II or III trials were replicated during the 4-year time frame. Of them, 39% were phase II, 61% phase III, 72% pharma sponsored, 39% included developing countries, and 59% were positive. The association of industry sponsorship and study positivity indicated a variation of up 3,55 appearances (p 0,017) in the number of times this research was orally presented. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that almost 20% of oral abstracts involving systemic therapies in GI cancers are presented more than once at relevant meetings, especially those with positive results and sponsored by pharma. Our study highlights the need for a more effective oral abstract selection system in oncology meetings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.