In this paper we explore the geometric space parametrized by (tree level) Wilson loops in SYM N = 4. We show that, this space can be seen as a vector bundle over a totally non-negative subspace of the Grassmannian, W k,cn . Furthermore, we explicitly show that this bundle is non-orientable in the majority of the cases, and conjecture that it is non-orientable in the remaining situation. Using the combinatorics of the Deodhar decomposition of the Grassmannian, we identify subspaces Σ(W ) ⊂ W k,n for which the restricted bundle lies outside the positive Grassmannian. Finally, while probing the combinatorics of the Deodhar decomposition, we give a diagrammatic algorithm for reading equations determining each Deodhar component as a semialgebraic set.
This paper shows that not only do the codimension one spurious poles of N k M HV tree level diagrams in N=4 SYM theory cancel in the tree level amplitude as expected, but their vanishing loci have a geometric interpretation that is tightly connected to their representation in the positive Grassmannians. In general, given a positroid variety, Σ, and a minimal matrix representation of it in terms of independent variable valued matrices, M V , one can define a polynomial, R(V) that is uniquely defined by the Grassmann necklace, I, of the positroid cell. The vanishing locus of R(V) lies on the boundary of the positive variety Σ \ Σ, but not all boundaries intersect the vanishing loci of a factor of R(V). We use this to show that the codimension one spurious poles of N=4 SYM, represented in twistor space, cancel in the tree level amplitude.
The Deodhar decomposition of the Grassmannian is a refinement of the Schubert, Richardson, and positroid stratifications of the Grassmannian. Godiagrams are certain fillings of Ferrers diagrams with black stones, white stones, and pluses which index Deodhar components in the Grassmannian.We provide a series of corrective flips on diagrams which may be used to transform arbitrary fillings of Ferrers shapes with black stones, white stones, and pluses into a Go-diagram. This provides an extension of Lam and Williams' Le-moves for transforming reduced diagrams into Le-diagrams to the context of non-reduced diagrams.Next, we address the question of describing when the closure of one Deodhar component is contained in the closure of another. We show that if one Go-diagram D is obtained from another D ′ by replacing certain stones with pluses, then applying corrective flips, that there is a containment of closures of the associated Deodhar components, D ′ ⊂ D.Finally, we address the question of verifying whether an arbitrary filling of a Ferrers shape with black stones, white stones, and pluses is a Go-diagram. We show that no reasonable description of the class of Go-diagrams in terms of forbidden subdiagrams can exist by providing an injection from the set of valid Go-diagrams to the set of minimal forbidden subdiagrams for the class of Go-diagrams. In lieu of such a description, we offer an inductive characterization of the class of Go-diagrams.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.