Closure of loop ileostomy in our series is safe, with a low serious morbidity rate. It may be feasible to perform reversal of ileostomy as a daycase/23-h stay. We intend to implement a 23-h stay for reversal of ileostomy.
Background: Competency in surgical training is a topic of much recent discussion, with concern regarding the adequacy of current training schemes to achieve competency. Most programmes use caseload and primary operator rates to assess trainee progression. Some trainees still lack technical competence even when recommended procedural numbers are met. It is possible that current measures of individual's capabilities used in surgical education are outdated. Methods: Logbook data of New South Wales general surgical trainees between 2010 and 2012 was obtained through General Surgeons Australia. The top 10 most common operations recorded in trainee logbooks were identified. Individual trainee data were grouped by the surgical education and training year and primary operator versus assistant experience. The data were analysed focusing on the primary operator rate, comparing between trainee levels to identify progression. Results: A total of 183 319 operations were recorded in New South Wales general surgery trainee logbooks. A positive association was demonstrated between trainee seniority and primary operator rates for the most common procedures, indicating trainee's continual progression in experience as they advance. However, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, oversew of gastroduodenal ulcer, open cholecystectomy and right hemicolectomy showed poor primary operator rates among trainees regardless of trainee year, despite these operations being among the 10 most common. Conclusion: General surgical trainees accumulate operative experience with progression through the surgical education and training programme, highlighting expected technical progression and competency of trainees for common procedures. For less common or more complicated procedures, the use of entrustable professional activities and accompanying simulation training could be used to achieve the necessary technical expertise.
Introduction
Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is a rare cause of proximal intestinal obstruction. It is caused by a narrow aortomesenteric angle resulting in external compression of the duodenum as it traverses between the abdominal aorta and the superior mesenteric artery. Presenting symptoms tend to be non-specific and aetiological risk factors for this syndrome remain subjects to debate. The lack of awareness for this phenomenon often results in a delayed diagnosis, yet it can predispose to potentially life-threatening complications.
Case presentation
We describe an acquired case of SMA syndrome, in an 88-year old male who underwent an open appendicectomy 20 years prior. The patient presented with an 18-month history of progressive anorexia, weight loss, and intractable vomiting. After inconclusive initial investigations, an exploratory laparotomy demonstrated extensive postoperative adhesions, placing traction on the SMA through its ileocolic branch, resulting in acute angulation of the SMA and subsequent external duodenal compression.
Discussion
This case illustrates the acute evolving presentation of gastric and duodenal obstruction associated with SMA syndrome, and the need to raise the index of suspicion for its diagnosis. In this case, it is postulated that SMA syndrome presented as a late complication of an open appendicectomy - A rare presentation for a rare disease.
Conclusion
SMA syndrome is an uncommon, but important differential for upper gastrointestinal obstruction. This case illustrates the challenges in the diagnosis of this rare clinical entity. Further study is warranted to understand the varied aetiology and optimal management for patients presenting with SMA syndrome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.