No abstract

Approximately 30% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients show impaired cognitive performance, which is suggestive of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), representing a predictor of dementia, especially when present at diagnosis. The objective of the study was to evaluate the frequency and clinical predictors of MCI in a large hospital-based cohort of PD patients. We collected cross-sectional data from the Parkinson's disease cognitive impairment study (PACOS), a multicenter study involving two Movement Disorder centers, which are located in south Italy. The PD subjects were diagnosed according to the UK Brain Bank criteria and they underwent an extensive neuropsychological assessment. PD-MCI was diagnosed according to the Movement Disorder Society task force criteria for MCI. PD severity was evaluated in accordance with the Unified PD Rating Scale-Motor Examination (UPDRS-ME) and the Hoehn and Yahr scales. The study included 659 PD patients (57.5% men; mean age 67.0 ± 9.7 years), with a mean disease duration of 3.8 ± 4.6 years and a mean UPRDS-ME score of 25.8 ± 12.3. PD-MCI was diagnosed in 261 (39.6%) subjects and in 82 (31.7%) of 259 newly diagnosed patients (disease duration ≤ 1 year). An amnestic MCI multidomain phenotype was the most frequent MCI subtype (39.1% of the overall sample and 43.9% in newly diagnosed PD). A positive significant association between MCI, age and motor scores was found at multivariate logistic regression analysis, while a negative association was observed between educational level and MCI. In conclusion and in agreement with the literature data, the prevalence of MCI recorded in the PACOS sample was approximately 40 and 32% amongst newly diagnosed patients.

• A new automatic method for calculating the MRPI is presented. • Automatic MRPI values are in good agreement with manual values. • Automatic MRPI can distinguish patients with PSP from patients with PD. • The automatic method overcomes MRPI application limitations in routine practice. • The automatic method may allow a more widespread use of MRPI.

ObjectiveTo gain further insight on the association between human toxocariasis and epilepsy in light of the new evidence in the last years.MethodsA systematic review was conducted without date and language restriction in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Ingenta Connect, Science Direct (Elsevier), RefDoc, Scopus, HighWire, Scielo and the database of the Institute of Neuroepidemiology and Tropical Neurology of the Limoges University (IENT). Two investigators independently conducted the search up to November 2017. A pooled odds ratio (OR) was estimated using a random effects model. Meta-regression was conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.ResultsDatabase search produced 204 publications. Eleven case-control studies were included that were carried out in 13 countries worldwide. A total number of 4740 subjects were considered (2159 people with epilepsy and 2581 people without epilepsy). The overall pooled OR was 1.69 (95% CI 1.42–2.01) for the association between epilepsy and Toxocara spp. seropositivity. A positive association was constantly reported in the restricted analysis (WB as confirmatory or diagnostic test, younger population, and population–based studies). Meta-regression showed no statistically significant association between covariates and outcome.ConclusionThe updated meta-analysis provides epidemiological evidence of a positive association between Toxocara seropositivity and epilepsy. New surveys supported the association, mainly population-based studies. On this basis, health strategies to reduce the impact of Toxocara spp are strongly advised. Further research should be performed to understand the physiopathological mechanisms of toxocara-associated epileptogenesis.

IntroductionEpilepsy is one of the most common neurological diseases in Latin American Countries (LAC) and epilepsy associated with convulsive seizures is the most frequent type. Therefore, the detection of convulsive seizures is a priority, but a validated Spanish-language screening tool to detect convulsive seizures is not available. We performed a field validation to evaluate the accuracy of a Spanish-language questionnaire to detect convulsive seizures in rural Bolivia using a three-stage design. The questionnaire was also administered face-to-face, using a two-stage design, to evaluate the difference in accuracy.MethodsThe study was carried out in the rural communities of the Gran Chaco region. The questionnaire consists of a single screening question directed toward the householders and a confirmatory section administered face-to-face to the index case. Positive subjects underwent a neurological examination to detect false positive and true positive subjects. To estimate the proportion of false negative, a random sample of about 20% of the screened negative underwent a neurological evaluation.Results792 householders have been interviewed representing a population of 3,562 subjects (52.2% men; mean age 24.5 ± 19.7 years). We found a sensitivity of 76.3% (95% CI 59.8–88.6) with a specificity of 99.6% (95% CI 99.4–99.8). The two-stage design showed only a slightly higher sensitivity respect to the three-stage design.ConclusionOur screening tool shows a good accuracy and can be easily used by trained health workers to quickly screen the population of the rural communities of LAC through the householders using a three-stage design.