The presentation and long-term therapeutic responses of PRL-secreting pituitary tumors in men have been only partially studied. Gender-specific differences in tumor size at clinical presentation and possible differences in tumor biology in men compared to women make it important to determine treatment outcomes of male patients with prolactinomas. We performed a retrospective review of men with prolactinomas medically managed at Massachusetts General Hospital between 1980 and 1997. We identified 46 male patients with prolactinomas managed with medical therapy alone. Twelve patients had microadenomas, defined as a serum PRL level greater than 15 ng/mL and a normal pituitary scan or a tumor smaller than 1 cm. Thirty-four patients had macroprolactinomas, defined by a serum PRL greater than 200 ng/mL and pituitary adenoma larger than 1 cm. Bromocriptine, quinagolide, and/or cabergoline were administered as medical therapy. All patients had at least one follow-up visit, and the most recent serum PRL measurement after initiating dopamine agonist therapy was reported. Baseline clinical characteristics for patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas showed a larger proportion of patients with macroprolactinomas reporting a history of headache (74% vs. 0%), whereas the prevalence of sexual dysfunction and testosterone deficiency was similar between the two groups. Median serum PRL at presentation was 99 ng/mL (range, 16-385 ng/mL) vs. 1,415 ng/mL (range, 387-67,900 ng/mL), in the microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma groups, respectively. A normal PRL level was achieved in a similar percentage of men with microprolactinomas vs. macroprolactinomas (83% vs. 79%, respectively). Although the majority of patients in both groups were treated with bromocriptine, a comparable number of patients with microprolactinomas vs. macroprolactinomas achieved a normal PRL level with cabergoline therapy. The response rates for bromocriptine and cabergoline were similar in both groups. No patient with a microprolactinoma required hormone replacement therapy, in contrast to patients with macroprolactinomas, who required thyroid, testosterone, and/or glucocorticoid replacement therapy. No patient had evidence of an increase in tumor size during therapy. In summary, we investigated the clinical presentation and treatment outcome in men with prolactinomas. We found that normalization of serum PRL levels occurs in approximately 80% of men with prolactinomas. Of importance, dopamine agonist administration yielded similar biochemical remission rates in men with microprolactinomas and macroprolactinomas.
Adrenal-renal fusion with adrenal cortical adenoma is a rare anomaly with only a few cases described in the literature. Imaging-based identification of this anomaly remains a diagnostic challenge, making it difficult to differentiate upper pole renal malignancy from adrenal cortical adenoma. We describe a case of a 62-year-old woman with an upper pole cystic renal mass on imaging, who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy. Intraoperatively the renal mass was found to be an adrenal-renal fusion anomaly, with ectopic adrenal tissue. Adrenal-renal infusion of an adrenal cortical adenoma was confirmed on final pathology. Due to lack of imaging-based diagnosis, this condition should be considered in the differential for upper pole renal masses.
formed tubular and glomerular-like structures at 1 and 2 months postsurgery. The bioprinted renal constructs exhibited the structural and functional characteristics of the native renal tissue.CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential of the tissuespecific ECM-derived bioink for cell-based bioprinting that could enhance cellular maturation and eventually tissue formation. 3D bioprinting strategy with kidney-specific ECM bioink has excellent potential to bioengineer a functional renal tissue construct in future regenerative medicine applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.