Study Design. Survey-based study.Objective. We performed a mixed methods study involving patients using telemedicine for spine care. We sought to understand factors influencing the utilization and evaluation of this modality. Summary of Background Data. Telemedicine has been integrated into routine spine care; its long-term viability will depend not only on optimizing its safety, efficiency, and costeffectiveness, but also on understanding patient valuation of its benefits and limitations. Methods. We used a clinical registry to identify spine patients seen virtually by providers at our tertiary academic medical center between March and September of 2020. We distributed an online survey that queried patients' experiences with telemedicine. We performed statistical analyses of Likert-scale questions and a thematic analysis of free-form responses. Sociodemographic data were abstracted and analyzed. Results. Overall, we evaluated 139 patient surveys. High levels of patient-rated care and patient-rated experience were observed for both in-person and telemedicine visits; however, in-person visits were rated significantly higher in both respects (9.3/10 vs. 8.7/10 for patient-rated care, P < 0.001; 9.0/10 vs. 8.4/10 for patient-rated experience, P ¼ 0.006). A preference for in-person first-time visits was observed which was not maintained for follow up appointments. Both patient and clinical factors influenced perceptions of telemedicine. Thematic analysis of free-form responses provided by 113 patients (81%) generated favorable, unfavorable, and reflective themes, each further contextualized by subthemes. Responders were not significantly different from nonresponders across sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusion. Our quantitative and qualitative findings yield insight into the patient experience of telemedicine in spine care. A preference for in-person visits was notable, particularly for new patient evaluations. This preference was not maintained for follow-up care. Patients acknowledged the benefits of telemedicine and reflected on its effective integration with in-person care. These results may guide best practices to improve access and patient satisfaction in the future.

Study Design. Retrospective review of prospective longitudinal data. Objective. To determine health-related quality of life (HRQL) utilities associated with specific ambulatory states in patients with spinal metastases: independent, ambulatory with assistance, and nonambulatory. Summary of Background Data. It is assumed that HRQL is aligned with ambulatory ability in patients with spinal metastases. Few studies have effectively considered these parameters while also accounting for clinical confounders. Methods. We used prospective longitudinal data from patients treated at one of three tertiary medical centers (2017)(2018)(2019). HRQL was characterized using the Euroquol-5-dimension (EQ5D) inventory. We performed standardized estimations of HRQL stratified by ambulatory state using generalized linear modeling that accounted for patient age at presentation, biologic sex, follow-up duration, operative or nonoperative management, and repeated measures within the same participant. Results. We evaluated 675 completed EQ5D assessments, with 430 for independent ambulators, 205 for ambulators with assistance, and 40 for nonambulators. The average age of the cohort was 61.5. The most common primary cancer was lung (20%), followed by breast (18%). Forty-one percent of assessments were performed for participants treated surgically. Mortality occurred in 51% of the cohort. The standardized EQ5D utility for patients with spinal metastases and independent ambulatory function was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74, 0.78). Among those ambulatory with assistance, the standardized EQ5D utility was 0.59 (95% CI 0.57, 0.61). For nonambulators, the standardized EQ5D utility was 0.14 (95% CI 0.09, 0.19). Conclusion. Patients with spinal metastases and independent ambulatory function have an HRQL similar to patients with primary cancers and no spinal involvement. Loss of ambulatory ability leads to a 22% decrease in HRQL for ambulation with assistance and an 82% reduction among nonambulators. Given prior studies demonstrate superior maintenance of ambulatory function with surgery for spinal metastases, our results support surgical consideration to the extent that it is clinically warranted.