Liver abscesses in feedlot cattle are detrimental to animal performance and economic return. Tylosin, a macrolide antibiotic, is used to reduce prevalence of liver abscesses, though there is variable efficacy among different groups of cattle. There is an increased importance in better understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of this condition because of growing concern over antibiotic resistance and increased scrutiny regarding use of antibiotics in food animal production. The objective of this study was to compare the microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance genes (resistomes) of feces of feedlot cattle administered or not administered tylosin and in their pen soil in 3 geographical regions with differing liver abscess prevalences. Cattle (total of 2,256) from 3 geographical regions were selected for inclusion based on dietary supplementation with tylosin (yes/no). Feces and pen soil samples were collected before harvest, and liver abscesses were identified at harvest. Shotgun and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing were used to evaluate the soil and feces. Microbiome and resistome composition of feces (as compared by UniFrac distances and Euclidian distances, respectively) did not differ (P > 0.05) among tylosin or no tylosin-administered cattle. However, feedlot location was associated with differences (P ≤ 0.05) of resistomes and microbiomes. Using LASSO, a statistical model identified both fecal and soil microbial communities as predictive of liver abscess prevalence in pens. This model explained 75% of the variation in liver abscess prevalence, though a larger sample size would be needed to increase robustness of the model. These data suggest that tylosin exposure does not have a large impact on cattle resistomes or microbiomes, but instead, location of cattle production may be a stronger driver of both the resistome and microbiome composition of feces.
Liver abscesses are a major economic burden to beef producers. Although a few causative organisms have been cultured from purulent material, the full polymicrobial diversity of liver abscesses has not been reported. The objective of this study was to characterize purulent material collected from liver abscess in beef cattle produced in different production systems in 3 cattle producing states in the United States using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Differences between purulent material microbial communities among geographic region of feeding and application of a common antimicrobial were also investigated. Cattle included in the study were fed in California (dairy type) and Colorado and Texas (both beef type). Liver abscesses from a cross section of feedlots, geographic areas, and tylosin phosphate-administered groups were collected at harvest; DNA from 34 liver abscess samples was extracted; and the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced. Sequences were classified into 5 phyla, 13 classes, and 17 orders in the domain Bacteria. The phyla identified included Bacteroidetes (35.2% of reads), Proteobacteria (28.6%), Fusobacteria (18.2%), Firmicutes (12.4%), and Actinobacteria (5.5%). Sequences matching the genera and , which have previously been identified as causative agents in liver abscesses, were both present in the abscess bacterial communities at a relative abundance of 15.1 and 3.2%, respectively, of the overall relative abundance. Furthermore, 3 of the most common phyla were Gram-negative bacteria. An analysis-of-similarities test was conducted on Euclidean distances to assess differences between cattle treated and not treated with tylosin as well as to assess differences between geographic regions. Geographical region and treatment with tylosin did affect the microbiome ( = 0.002 and = 0.026 respectively); however, a more robust sample scheme is needed to explore these differences. To our knowledge, this is the first publication describing the complex community of liver purulent material using next generation sequencing in cattle. These data provide a framework for research on a more targeted approach to liver abscess prevention and treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.