Bone plating has been used as a method of fracture management for many years. Recently, a trend toward the use of fracture fixation techniques which preserve the local fracture environment, known as biological osteosynthesis, has evolved. This trend has resulted in the development of a less traumatic method of bone plating referred to as minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), or percutaneous plating. During MIPO fracture stabilisation, plates are inserted through short incisions and a communicating epiperiosteal tunnel. Typically, bone plates applied in this fashion have a bridging function. Promising outcomes have been reported in human patients undergoing MIPO fracture stabilisation, and limited reports of the use of this technique in dogs and cats have yielded positive results as well. Careful case selection, pre-operative planning, and appropriate instrumentation are necessary when performing the technique. Rapid time to union, low complication rates and good return to function have been noted in human patients. Additional research is needed to define selection criteria and outline the definitive benefits of MIPO in dogs and cats.

Osteochondral autografting for treatment of lateral femoral condylar OC lesions in dogs using OATS instrumentation is safe and results in improved function and quality of life based on owners' perception 6-15 months after treatment.

Radius and ulna fractures managed with MIPO had similar alignment, reduction, and time to union as fractures managed with ORIF. Future prospective clinical studies are warranted and should assess healing more frequently and in a standardized manner to compare MIPO to ORIF in a larger population of dogs.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: To compare femoral stem subsidence and determine contributing factors in dogs undergoing total hip replacement (THR) with the traditional BFX, collared BFX, and BFX lateral bolt stems.Study design: Retrospective radiographic study.Sample population: Ninety-three dogs with 101 THR including dogs undergoing THR with a BFX lateral bolt femoral stem (n = 40), BFX collared stem (n = 21), and traditional BFX stem (n = 40). Methods: Radiographs of traditional BFX (n = 40), collared BFX (n = 21), and BFX lateral bolt (n = 40) THR performed from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Subsidence, canal flare index (CFI), stem canal fill (CF), stem orientation, and complications confirmed on radiographs were recorded at postoperative and recheck radiographs. Analysis of variance tests were used to compare subsidence, CFI, stem orientation, and CF. A χ 2 analysis was performed to compare complication rates between groups. Results: Subsidence was lower after placement of BFX lateral bolt stems (median, 0.24 mm; interquartile range [IQR; 1.49) compared with collared (1.27 mm [2.29]) and BFX (1.35 mm [2.26]) stems. No difference in subsidence was detected between collared and BFX implants. Coronal CF was greater after placement of BFX (mean ± SD, 0.72 ± 0.06) compared with lateral bolt (0.69 ± 0.05) or collared (0.66 ± 0.07) stems. Sagittal CF differed between all groups (BFX 0.7 ± 0.05, lateral bolt 0.67 ± 0.06, and collared 0.61 ± 0.06). No differences were identified in CFI or stem orientation in the coronal and sagittal planes or in complication rates between implants. Conclusion:The BFX lateral bolt femoral stem was associated with less postoperative subsidence compared with the BFX collared and traditional BFX stems. No consistent changes in CF, CFI, or stem orientation or

No abstract