Background: Tumor treatment fields (TTFields) are an approved adjuvant therapy for glioblastoma (GBM). The magnitude of applied electrical field has been shown to be related to the anti-tumoral response. However, peritumoral edema may result in shunting of electrical current around the tumor, thereby reducing the intra-tumoral electric field. In this study, we systematically address this issue with computational simulations. Methods: Finite element models are created of a human head with varying amounts of peritumoral edema surrounding a virtual tumor. The electric field distribution was simulated using the standard TTFields electrode montage. Electric field magnitude was extracted from the tumor and related to edema thickness. Two patient specific models were created to confirm these results. Results: The inclusion of peritumoral edema decreased the average magnitude of the electric field within the tumor. In the model considering a frontal tumor and an anterior-posterior electrode configuration, ≥ 6 mm of peritumoral edema decreased the electric field by 52%. In the patient specific models, peritumoral edema decreased the electric field magnitude within the tumor by an average of 26%. The effect of peritumoral edema on the electric field distribution was spatially heterogenous, being most significant at the tissue interface between edema and tumor. Conclusions: The inclusion of peritumoral edema during TTFields modelling may have a dramatic effect on the predicted electric field magnitude within the tumor. Given the importance of electric field magnitude for the anti-tumoral effects of TTFields, the presence of edema should be considered both in future modelling studies and when planning TTField therapy. Index Terms-Glioma, Tumor treatment fields, finite element modelling I. INTRODUCTION LIOBLASTOMA Multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with a median survival of approximately 1 year, despite surgical and adjuvant treatment [1]. In recent years, new therapeutic technologies have been proposed in order to improve this prognosis. One technology

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used extensively in patient populations to facilitate motor network plasticity. However, it has not been studied in patients with brain tumors. We aimed to determine the feasibility of a preoperative motor training and tDCS intervention in patients with glioma. In an exploratory manner, we assessed changes in motor network connectivity following this intervention and related these changes to predicted electrical field strength from the stimulated motor cortex. Methods: Patients with left-sided glioma (n=8) were recruited in an open label proof of concept pilot trial and participated in four consecutive days of motor training combined with tDCS. The motor training consisted of a 60-min period where the subject learned to play the piano with their right hand. Concurrently, they received 40 min of 2 mA anodal tDCS of the left motor cortex. Patients underwent task and resting state fMRI before and after this intervention. Changes in both the connectivity of primary motor cortex (M1) and general connectivity across the brain were assessed. Patient specific finite element models were created and the predicted electrical field (EF) resulting from stimulation was computed. The magnitude of the EF was extracted from left M1 and correlated to the observed changes in functional connectivity. Results: There were no adverse events and all subjects successfully completed the study protocol. Left M1 increased both local and global connectivity. Voxel-wide measures, not constrained by a specific region, revealed increased global connectivity of the frontal pole and decreased global connectivity of the supplementary motor area. The magnitude of EF applied to the left M1 correlated with changes in global connectivity of the right M1. Conclusion: In this proof of concept pilot study, we demonstrate for the first time that tDCS appears to be feasible in glioma patients. In our exploratory analysis, we show preoperative motor training combined with tDCS may alter sensorimotor network connectivity. Patient specific modeling of EF in the presence of tumor may contribute to understanding the dose-response relationship of this intervention. Overall, this suggests the possibility of modulating neural networks in glioma patients.

Background: Tumor treatment fields (TTFields) are an approved adjuvant therapy for glioblastoma. The magnitude of applied electrical field is related to the anti-tumoral response. However, peritumoral edema (ptE) may result in shunting of electrical current around the tumor, thereby reducing the intra-tumoral electric field. In this study, we address this issue with computational simulations. Methods: Finite element models were created with varying amounts of ptE surrounding a virtual tumor. The electric field distribution was simulated using the standard TTFields electrode montage. Electric field magnitude was extracted from the tumor and related to edema thickness. Two patient specific models were created to confirm these results. Results: The inclusion of ptE decreased the magnitude of the electric field within the tumor. In the model considering a frontal tumor and an anterior-posterior electrode configuration, ≥ 6 mm of ptE decreased the electric field by 52%. In the patient specific models, ptE decreased the electric field within the tumor by an average of 26%. The effect of ptE on the electric field distribution was spatially heterogenous. Conclusions: Given the importance of electric field magnitude for the anti-tumoral effects of TTFields, the presence of edema should be considered both in future modelling studies and as a predictor of non-response.