Vulvar cancer is rare but incidence rates are increasing due to an aging population and higher frequencies of young women being affected. In locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent disease prognosis is poor and new treatment modalities are needed. Immune checkpoint blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is one of the most important advancements in cancer therapy in the last years. The clinical relevance of PD-L1 expression in vulvar cancer, however, has not been studied so far. We determined PD-L1 expression, numbers of CD3+ T cells, CD20+ B cells, CD68+ monocytes/macrophages, Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages by immunohistochemistry in 103 patients. Correlation analysis with clinicopathological parameters was undertaken; the cause-specific outcome was modeled with competing risk analysis; multivariate Cox regression was used to determine independent predictors of survival. Membranous PD-L1 was expressed in a minority of tumors, defined by HPV-negativity. Its presence geographically correlated with immunocyte-rich regions of cancer islets and was an independent prognostic factor for poor outcome. Our data support the notion that vulvar cancer is an immunomodulatory tumor that harnesses the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway to induce tolerance. Accordingly, immunotherapeutic approaches might have the potential to improve outcome in patients with vulvar cancer and could complement conventional cancer treatment.

Background/Aim: Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is one of the most common gynecological cancers in the Western Hemisphere. Nevertheless, there are not enough appropriate treatment options, especially for advanced stages. The immune checkpoint blockade represents a promising alternative to established cancer therapies by suppressing the immune-inhibitory activity of the immune checkpoint factors programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1). In the present study, we characterized the clinical relevance of the biomarker PD-L1 expression in terms of its prognostic capabilities in EC. Patients and Methods: Tumor tissue samples from 87 EC patients were retrospectively analyzed by immunohistochemistry (PD-L1, p16, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2/neu, Ki-67, CD3, CD20, CD68). Results: A total of 17.3% of EC patients were PD-L1 positive. PD-L1 status did not represent a suitable prognostic marker in EC, but correlated with T3/T4stage, positive lymph node status, p16 expression, and absence of estrogen and progesterone receptor. PD-L1 positive tissues showed increased infiltration with lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages, although not statistically significant in every case. Conclusion: In EC, PD-L1 expression has no prognostic significance, but correlates with other oncogenic factors and indicates increased infiltration of the tumor with immune cells. Thus, PD-1/PD-L1 immunecheckpoint blockade seems to be very promising, at least in a subset of EC patients.

No abstract

No abstract