This brief review focuses on health and biological function as cornerstones of fish welfare. From the function-based point of view, good welfare is reflected in the ability of the animal to cope with infectious and non-infectious stressors, thereby maintaining homeostasis and good health, whereas stressful husbandry conditions and protracted suffering will lead to the loss of the coping ability and, thus, to impaired health. In the first part of the review, the physiological processes through which stressful husbandry conditions modulate health of farmed fish are examined. If fish are subjected to unfavourable husbandry conditions, the resulting disruption of internal homeostasis necessitates energy-demanding physiological adjustments (allostasis/acclimation). The ensuing energy drain leads to trade-offs with other energy-demanding processes such as the functioning of the primary epithelial barriers (gut, skin, gills) and the immune system. Understanding of the relation between husbandry conditions, allostatic responses and fish health provides the basis for the second theme developed in this review, the potential use of biological function and health parameters as operational welfare indicators (OWIs). Advantages of function- and health-related parameters are that they are relatively straightforward to recognize and to measure and are routinely monitored in most aquaculture units, thereby providing feasible tools to assess fish welfare under practical farming conditions. As the efforts to improve fish welfare and environmental sustainability lead to increasingly diverse solutions, in particular integrated production, it is imperative that we have objective OWIs to compare with other production forms, such as high-density aquaculture. However, to receive the necessary acceptance for legislation, more robust scientific backing of the health- and function-related OWIs is urgently needed.

FcεR1-expressing neutrophils accumulate in the brain of mice infected with Plasmodium berghei (PbANKA) and promote the development of experimental cerebral malaria.

Background-18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been recently acknowledged as a diagnostic tool for prosthetic valve endocarditis, but its specificity is limited by uptake on noninfected valves. The objective of this study was to outline the main features of FDG uptake on PET/CT in patients with noninfected prosthetic heart valve (PHV). Methods and Results-Our institution's PET/CT database was reviewed to identify patients with PHV, excluding those suspected of infection or who had received antibiotic treatment. PET indication, valve location, and type (biological/ mechanical) and time from implantation were collected for each patient. Images with and without attenuation correction were considered for interpretation. The pattern of FDG uptake (absent, homogeneous, or heterogeneous) was recorded. Fifty-four PHVs (51 patients) were identified, including 32 biological valves. Indications for PET were oncology (n=26), suspicion of prosthetic valve endocarditis subsequently excluded (n=17), and history of vasculitis (n=11). A periprosthetic FDG uptake was present in 47 (87%) and 30 (56%) PHVs with and without attenuation correction, respectively, and the pattern was homogeneous in all but 4 (7%) and 3 (6%) PHVs, respectively. On quantitative analysis, maximum standardized uptake values was greater in mechanical than in biological valves