Stratifying eyes according to presurgical IOP showed greater long-term IOP reductions than previously reported. The reduction was proportional to the presurgical IOP. The decrease was greatest in eyes with the highest presurgical IOP. The IOP remained unchanged in eyes with the lowest presurgical IOP. The IOP reductions at 1 year were sustained over 10 years and were similar in patients of all ages.
Purpose: To examine the influence of the inverted flap (IF) internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique in macular hole (MH) closure on outer retinal layers after MH surgery. Methods: Retrospective study. Postoperative position of ILM, recovery rate of external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone, and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated. The Inserted group, where the IF is placed inside the hole, was compared with the Cover group, where the IF completely covers the hole. Results: Sixty-two eyes of 58 patients who underwent vitrectomy and ILM peeling with the IF technique for large MHs (>400 µm) with successful MH closure and a follow-up of 12 months were evaluated. In the 24 eyes of the Inserted group, there was no regeneration of external limiting membrane or ellipsoid zone after 12 months. In the 38 eyes of Cover group, external limiting membrane recovered in 55.3% of patients 1 month after surgery, and in 86.1% after 12 months. The elipsoid zone layer was present in 58% of the patients. Conclusion: Poorer anatomical and visual results were associated with the IF technique where ILM insertion occurs compared with ILM placed over the hole. These findings suggest that insertion of the ILM in the hole might prevent outer retinal layers realignment and visual recovery in MH surgery.
We hypothesize that patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) may have abnormal retinal vascular responses before diabetic retinopathy (DR) is clinically evident. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) was used to dynamically assess the retinal microvasculature of diabetic patients with no clinically visible retinopathy. METHODS. Controlled nonrandomized interventional study. The studied population included 48 eyes of 24 T1D patients and 24 demographically similar healthy volunteers. A commercial OCTA device (AngioVue) was used, and two tests were applied: (1) the hypoxia challenge test (HCT) and (2) the handgrip test to induce a vasodilatory or vasoconstrictive response, respectively. The HCT is a standardized test that creates a mild hypoxic environment equivalent to a flight cabin. The handgrip test (i.e., isometric exercise) induces a sympathetic autonomic response. Changes in the parafoveal superficial and deep capillary plexuses in both tests were compared in each group. Systemic cardiovascular responses were also comparatively evaluated. RESULTS. In the control cohort, the vessel density of the median parafoveal superficial and deep plexuses increased during hypoxia (F 1,23 = 15.69, P < 0.001 and F 1,23 = 16.26, P < 0.001, respectively). In the T1D group, this physiological response was not observed in either the superficial or the deep retinal plexuses. Isometric exercise elicited a significant decrease in vessel density in both superficial and deep plexuses in the control group (F 1,23 = 27.37, P < 0.0001 and F 1,23 = 27.90, P < 0.0001, respectively). In the T1D group, this response was noted only in the deep plexus (F 1,23 = 11.04, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. Our work suggests there is an early impairment of the physiological retinal vascular response in patients with T1D without clinical diabetic retinopathy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.