BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Parapneumonic empyema (PPE) is a frequent complication of acute bacterial pneumonia in children. There is limited evidence regarding the optimal treatment of this condition. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of drainage plus urokinase versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of PPE in childhood. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial enrolled patients aged <15 years and hospitalized with septated PPE. Study patients were randomized to receive urokinase or thoracoscopy. The main outcome variable was the length of hospital stay after treatment. The secondary outcomes were total length of hospital stay, number of days with the chest drain, number of days with fever, and treatment failures. The trial was approved by the ethics committees of all the participating hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were randomized to treatment and analyzed; 53 were treated with thoracoscopy and 50 with urokinase. There were no differences in demographic characteristics or in the main baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. No statistically significant differences were found between thoracoscopy and urokinase in the median postoperative stay (10 vs 9 days), median hospital stay (14 vs 13 days), or days febrile after treatment (4 vs 6 days). A second intervention was required in 15% of children in the thoracoscopy group versus 10% in the urokinase group (P = .47). CONCLUSIONS: Drainage plus urokinase instillation is as effective as video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as first-line treatment of septated PPE in children.

The authors present their experience in the medical treatment of 1, 296 caustic esophageal injuries in children over the last 20 years in two study groups, one comprising the period up to 1989 and the other 1990 to 1996, comparing the different treatments used in each group. The treatment was based fundamentally on dilatations with anterograde mercury bougies, Savary bougies, or retrograde thread-guided bougies with gastrostomy. Pneumatic balloons or stenting procedures have also been employed in the last 3 years. Early fiberendoscopy was used systematically in the second group, which provides a more accurate evaluation of the esophageal lesions. Antibiotic coverage was done systematically during the first 10 days in all serious cases, while steroids were employed routinely only in the last 3 years. The results were similar in both groups, with a dilatation average of 32 in the first and 30 in the second group and an initial dilatation interval of 3 to 4 weeks in both. Using updated exploration and dilatation techniques, we drastically reduced the number of gastrostomies needed for retrograde thread-guided dilatations from 51 in the first group to 5 in the second, consequently improving the patients' life quality. There was no mortality and only five esophageal perforations, which did not require surgical treatment.

The endoscopic approach of late-presenting Morgagni and Bochdalek CDH is a safe technique. It offers all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and laparoscopy also permits the diagnosis and treatment of other associated conditions. There are a short number of cases reported and no prospective study comparing open with the MIS approach for the treatment of diaphragmatic malformations.

No abstract

Fetoscopy can lower the incidence of preterm labor that occurs in response to the aggression of open surgery. At present, fetoscopy is effective for treating several fetal anomalies. Preterm rupture of membranes remains the weak link of fetoscopy. Refinement of the technique and technologic advances will help this problem and allow the use of fetoscopy for other pathologies in the future.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract