Rodent pests are especially problematic in terms of agriculture and public health since they can inflict considerable economic damage associated with their abundance, diversity, generalist feeding habits and high reproductive rates. To quantify rodent pest impacts and identify trends in rodent pest research impacting on small-holder agriculture in the Afro-Malagasy region we did a systematic review of research outputs from 1910 to 2015, by developing an a priori defined set of criteria to allow for replication of the review process. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed 162 publications, and while rodent pest research was spatially distributed across Africa (32 countries, including Madagascar), there was a disparity in number of studies per country with research biased towards four countries (Tanzania [25%], Nigeria [9%], Ethiopia [9%], Kenya [8%]) accounting for 51% of all rodent pest research in the Afro-Malagasy region. There was a disparity in the research themes addressed by Tanzanian publications compared to publications from the rest of the Afro-Malagasy region where research in Tanzania had a much more applied focus (50%) compared to a more basic research approach (92%) in the rest of the Afro-Malagasy region. We found that pest rodents have a significant negative effect on the Afro-Malagasy small-holder farming communities. Crop losses varied between cropping stages, storage and crops and the highest losses occurred during early cropping stages (46% median loss during seedling stage) and the mature stage (15% median loss). There was a scarcity of studies investigating the effectiveness of various management actions on rodent pest damage and population abundance. Our analysis highlights that there are inadequate empirical studies focused on developing sustainable control methods for rodent pests and rodent pests in the Africa-Malagasy context is generally ignored as a research topic.
Soil microbial communities perform critical functions in ecosystem processes. These functions can be used to assess the impact of agricultural practices on sustainable crop production. In this five-year study, the effect of various agricultural practices on soil microbial diversity and activity was investigated in a summer rainfall area under South African dryland conditions. Microbial diversity and activity were measured in the 0-15 cm layer of a field trial consisting of two fertilizer levels, three cropping systems, and two tillage systems. Using the Shannon-Weaver and Evenness diversity indices, soil microbial species richness and abundance were measured. Microbial enzymatic activities: β-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease, were used to evaluate ecosystem functioning. Cluster analysis revealed a shift in soil microbial community diversity and activity over time. Microbial diversity and activity were higher under no-till than conventional tillage. Fertilizer levels seemed to play a minor role in determining microbial diversity and activity, whereas the cropping systems played a more important role in determining the activity of soil microbial communities. Conservation agriculture yielded the highest soil microbial diversity and activity in diversified cropping systems under no-till.
Conservation agriculture (CA), with reduced tillage, permanent soil cover and diversified cropping systems, is advocated in southern Africa to improve soil quality, reduce input costs and mitigate climate-induced risks. However, improvements in terms of yield and soil organic carbon (SOC) under CA are slow and variable and many small-scale farmers are unable to buffer themselves against potential short-term financial losses. In this study we examined the effects of CA-related management practices on SOC sequestration and productivity at two medium-term sites on a sandy soil (eight year trial) and clay soil (six years) in maize producing areas of South Africa. Using field data, current input costs and market prices for crops, we calculated the gross margin for each system. Treatments compared conventional ploughing under maize monoculture with reduced tillage, intercropping and crop rotation. On the clay soil, SOC was increased under reduced tillage (57.6 t C ha-1) compared to conventional tillage (54.9 t C ha-1) while there was no difference for the sandy soil (19.7 t C ha-1 average across treatments). Profitability was most strongly influenced by seasonal rainfall, but was higher on the sandy soil than the clay soil, with an average gross margin of R11,344 ha-1 and R5,686 ha-1 , respectively. This study has demonstrated that while certain CA practices can create sitespecific benefits for farmers, it is highly dependent on local weather and soil conditions. For the clay soil an additional payment scheme would be required to reward farmers in southern Africa for C-sequestration to make CA profitable and achieve increased C-mitigation through soil sequestration.
SummaryIn Mana Pools National Park, Zimbabwe, 124 baobabs near the Zambezi river were monitored for elephant damage at monthly intervals between 1984 and 1988. Overall mortality was 29.0%. Damage and mortality rates varied annually, possibly related to annual rainfall linked with elephant densities. There was no indication that mortality was higher in any particular size group of baobab. Damage was restricted to the dry season, escalating as the season progressed. Only trees smaller than 7.5 m (GWH) had the ability to coppice after being felled. Many small trees (<2.5 m GWH) were thought to have regrown after felling some time prior to the study.RésuméAu Parc National de Mana Pools, au Zimbabwe, on a surveillé sur 124 baobabs situés près du Zambèze, les dommages causés par les éléphants, chaque mois entre 1984 et 1988. La mortalité totale a été de 29,0%. Les taux de dommages et de mortalité variaient annuellement, peut‐ètre en raison des chutes de pluies, associées à la densité des éléphants. II n'y a eu aucun signe que la mortalité soit plus élevée, quelle que soit la taille du groupe de baobabs. Les dommages se limitaient à la saison sèche et augmentaient avec l'avancement de la saison. Seuls les arbres plus petits que 7,5 m (GWH) étaient à même de lancer des rejets après avoir été abattus. On pense que beaucoup de petits arbres (moins de 2,5 m GWH) avaient ainsi poussé suite à des abattages quelque temps avant cette étude.
Soil organic matter (SOM) is tightly linked to soil quality, but cultivation generally causes a rundown of SOM, reducing soil quality and releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.Internationally, countries are expected to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and compile and update GHG inventories. Many developing countries, such as those in southern Africa, do not have reliable information regarding SOM levels in cultivated soils, changes over time and best management practices to maintain or even restore SOM. A review was conducted to collate published research on SOM [or its indicator elements, carbon (C) and nitrogen] in cultivated fields in southern Africa. A total of 84 publications were assessed, and information such as date, location, SOM/soil organic carbon (SOC) content, clay and key findings were recorded. The spatial distribution of these studies is very unequal, and focused on the central maize producing areas of South Africa. Analysis of the data shows an average SOC of 0.7 % in low rainfall areas, and up to 2.5% in higher rainfall areas. A 2 rundown of 46% of SOC due to cultivation was representative for all cultivated fields in southern Africa (R 2 = 0.84). Research gaps include understanding C sequestration and GHG emission dynamics under various management systems and for different climatic regions, which are important from a soil quality perspective as well as for inventory purposes; to help understand how field crop production can play a role in mitigating climate change; as well as a lack of multi-institutional collaboration and facilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.