Objectives: To summarize the available evidence on the diagnostic performance for invasive aspergillosis (IA) in non-hematological, non-solid organ transplantation critically ill patients of the following: (i) existing definitions of IA (developed either for classical immunocompromised populations or for nonimmunocompromised critically ill patients); (ii) laboratory tests; (iii) radiology tests. Methods: A systematic review was performed by evaluating studies assessing the diagnostic performance for IA of a definition/s and/or laboratory/radiology test/s vs. a reference standard (histology) or a reference definition. Results: Sufficient data for evaluating the performance of existing definitions and laboratory tests for the diagnosis of IA in critically ill patients is available only for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Against histology/autopsy as reference, the AspICU definition showed a promising diagnostic performance but based on small samples and applicable only to patients with positive respiratory cultures. Studies on laboratory tests consistently indicated a better diagnostic performance of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) galactomannan (GM) than serum GM, and a suboptimal specificity of BALF and serum (1,3)-β-Dglucan. Conclusions: Evidence stemming from this systematic review will guide the discussion for defining invasive aspergillosis within the FUNDICU project. The project aims to develop a standard set of definitions for invasive fungal diseases in critically ill, adult patients.

from the Study Group for Infections in Critically Ill Patients (ESGCIP) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)

Background The Fungal Infections Definitions in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients (FUNDICU) project aims to provide standard sets of definitions for invasive fungal diseases in critically ill, adult patients. Objectives To summarise the available evidence on the diagnostic performance of clinical scores and laboratory tests for invasive candidiasis (IC) in nonneutropenic, adult critically ill patients. Methods A systematic review was performed to evaluate studies assessing the diagnostic performance for IC of clinical scores and/or laboratory tests vs. a reference standard or a reference definition in critically ill, nonneutropenic, adult patients in ICU. Results Clinical scores, despite the heterogeneity of study populations and IC prevalences, constantly showed a high negative predictive value (NPV) and a low positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of IC in the target population. Fungal antigen‐based biomarkers (with most studies assessing serum beta‐D‐glucan) retained a high NPV similar to that of clinical scores, with a higher PPV, although the latter showed important heterogeneity across studies, possibly reflecting the targeted or untargeted use of these tests in patients with a consistent clinical picture and risk factors for IC. Conclusions Both clinical scores and laboratory tests showed high NPV for the diagnosis of IC in nonneutropenic critically ill patients. The PPV of laboratory tests varies significantly according to the baseline patients' risk of IC. This qualitative synthesis will provide the FUNDICU panel with baseline evidence to be considered during the development of definitions of IC in critically ill, nonneutropenic adult patients in ICU.

Background Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) is a daily oral medication prescribed for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer (BC) to reduce recurrence and mortality risks. However, many women do not take AET daily or do not persist with AET for the recommended duration of at least 5 years. Our aims were to identify: 1) trajectories of AET adherence for the 5 years; 2) factors associated with these trajectories. Methods The French Cancer Cohort includes data on hospitalizations, ambulatory care and drug claims for all cancers diagnosed in France (SNDS database). Women diagnosed with a 1st non-metastatic BC in 2011 who had ≥ 1 AET claim within 12 months of surgery were included. For each woman, we estimated the monthly proportion of days covered (PDC) by an AET for 5 years after the first AET. Monthly PDCs were used to model AET adherence trajectories using group-based trajectory modeling. Statistical criteria were used to assess the suitability of the selected model. The factors associated with the trajectories were identified using multinomial logistic regressions. Results 33,260 women were included. A 6-trajectory model was selected: 1) Stop of AET in the 1st year (6.6%), 2) Adherence for 1 year and stop (5.7%), 3) Adherence for 2.5y and stop (6.3%), 4) High adherence for 4.5y and stop (8.3%), 5) Sub-optimal adherence for 5y (4.3%), 6) Very high adherence for 5y (68.8%). Factors associated with non-adherence trajectories are mainly extreme age (>70y) and switch in AET. Conclusions About 70% of women had an optimal adherence for 5 years. Our results showed that women who changed AET during the treatment course were at higher risk of non-adherence. Among non-adherent women, the switch in AET is frequent and probably often related to the management of side effects. Interventions to detect and manage these side effects may help to support women with AET use. Effective management of these effects during all the 5 years could be needed to maintain adherence. Key messages About 70% of women had an optimal adherence for 5 years. Women who changed AET during the treatment course were at higher risk of non-adherence.