The colonization of catheters by microorganisms often precludes their long-term use, which can be a problem for human patients that have few body sites available for new catheters. The colonizing organisms often form biofilms, and increasingly these organisms are resistant to multiple antibiotics, making them difficult to treat. In this article, we have taken microorganisms that are associated with biofilm formation in catheters from two Canadian hospitals and tested them with tetrasodium EDTA, a new antimicrobial catheter lock solution. Tetrasodium EDTA was effective at eliminating Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal species and represents a promising alternative to antibiotic treatment with less chance of the organisms developing resistance. We expect that our results will be of interest to researchers and clinicians and will lead to improved patient care.

A cross-over study was performed in six adult spayed cats to determine the pharmacokinetics of clomipramine and its metabolite, desmethylclomipramine (DCMP) after intravenous (0.25 mg/kg) and oral (0.5 mg/kg) single-dose administrations. Plasma clomipramine and DCMP were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at regular intervals for up to 30 h. Intravenous clomipramine best fit a two-compartmental model yielding an elimination rate constant of 0.037-0.09 h(-1) from which a mean half-life of 12.3 h was calculated. Mean clomipramine AUC(0--infinity) (ngxh/mL), clearance (L/hxkg), V(ss) (L/kg) and MRT (h) values were 652.5, 0.393, 5.0, and 13.5, respectively. Compartmental modeling for clomipramine, after oral administration, and DCMP after both administrations, produced wide parameter estimates and plots of residuals indicated poor goodness of fit. Noncompartmental analysis yielded mean AUC(0--30 h) (ngxh/mL), C(max) (ng/mL) and T(max) (h) of 948.3, 87.5 and 6.2 for clomipramine, and 613.8, 34.8, and 12.8 for DCMP respectively after oral administration. Clomipramine bioavailability was 90%. The present study showed marked pharmacokinetic variability for clomipramine and DCMP through biphasic absorption and potential genetic variability in clomipramine metabolism. It was concluded that population pharmacokinetics would allow better characterization of clomipramine variability that may explain the variability in clinical response noted in cats.

This study was conducted to confirm an interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters of clomipramine in a large population of cats and to identify potential covariables that would explain the presence of such pharmacokinetic variability after a single dose of Clomicalm. Clomipramine hydrochloride was administered orally according to a weight-dose chart from 0.32 to 0.61 mg/kg, to 76 cats and five blood samples were then taken by direct venipuncture at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. Plasma concentrations of clomipramine and desmethylclomipramine (DCMP) were measured by LC-MS/MS. The Standard Two-Stage technique was used to assess differences and detect correlations between pharmacokinetic parameter estimates and individual covariables. A large interindividual variability in all pharmacokinetic parameters (CV% 64-124) was detected. Statistically significant gender-related differences were detected in MR and Cl/F, where female cats had a higher mean MR (0.53) and faster Cl/F (0.36 L/h.kg) than males (0.36 and 0.21 L/h.kg, respectively). No correlation could be found between clomipramine AUC0-24 h or DCMP AUC0-24 h and sedation scores. Further feline studies are required to assess these findings after multiple dosing of clomipramine and DCMP to allow clinical extrapolation.

This article explores the numerous challenges encountered when the goal is to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) between test and reference intramammary (IMM) products in ruminants. Numerous pathophysiological factors of mastitis and physicochemical properties of IMM formulations are implicated in the difficulties in confirming BE for this dosage form. Advantages and disadvantages of current BE study designs are discussed, and alternative perspectives are outlined. Ongoing and future research increasing our knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs delivered through this route is crucial to better understanding the implications of clinically significant formulation differences in the demonstration of BE and may also help in developing more effective IMM formulations for ruminants.

For drug products not amenable to blood level studies, clinical endpoint studies have been used as an indirect measure of formulation difference in bioavailability between test and reference products. However, clinical endpoint studies are not as sensitive in detecting formulation differences as blood level studies and offer numerous challenges to both regulatory authorities and sponsors. The objective of this article is not to suggest new regulatory policies, but to explore new methodologies and alternative solutions to clinical endpoint bioequivalence (BE) studies, which are used when a blood level study is not considered to be appropriate. To achieve this objective, this article identifies situations where a clinical endpoint study might be appropriate, lists the advantages and disadvantages of this type of study design, and discusses possible alternative solutions. It is concluded that future evidence-based research is needed to explore new methodologies such as clinical trial simulations of various study designs, new statistical methods, and new in vitro methods to demonstrate BE.