The objective of this study was to compare the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), pressure support ventilation (PS), and T-piece on the pressure-time product (PTP) during weaning from mechanical ventilation. The PTP is an estimate of the metabolic work or oxygen consumption of the respiratory muscles. We studied 10 intubated patients recovering from acute respiratory failure of various etiologies. A modified continuous flow (flow-by) CPAP of 0 and 5 cm H2O (CPAP-0 and CPAP-5, respectively), PS of 5 cm H2O (PS-5), and T-piece were applied in random order for 30 min each. In the last 5 min of the 30-min periods, we measured the esophageal pressure and transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products--PTP(es) and PTP(di), cm H2O.s/min, respectively-multiplied by respiratory frequency. Breathing pattern, total lung resistance (RL), quasi-static lung compliance (CL), intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Ptpexp), arterial blood gases, blood pressure, and heart rate were also measured. In comparison to T-piece, CPAP-5 decreased PTP(es) 40% (p less than 0.01) and PTP(di) 43% (p less than 0.02), whereas PS-5 decreased PTP(es) 34% (p less than 0.01) and PTP(di) 38% (p less than 0.05). The decrease in PTP(es) with CPAP-5 was associated with a significant reduction in RL, and to a less extent in PEEPi relative to airway pressure. The contribution of the decrease in PEEPi to the reduction in PTP(es) amounted to 36%. With PS-5, respiratory system mechanics and PEEPi were not significantly different compared with T-piece. With CPAP-0, PTP tended to be lower than with T-piece.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) and the ratio of breathing frequency (f) to tidal volume (VT) (f/Vt) are good predictors of weaning outcome. However, the specificity of f/VT in predicting weaning success is relatively low. We postulated that the product of P0.1 and f/VT (P0.1*f/VT) would better predict weaning outcome than either variable alone. In 45 male patients, we prospectively evaluated P0.1*f/VT, P0.1, and f/VT in predicting weaning outcome. The threshold values of each variable were determined from published data. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in detecting weaning success, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. Ten (22%) of the 45 patients failed weaning. P0.1*f/VT yielded the highest specificity and positive and negative predictive values. P0.1*f/VT, P0.1, and f/VT were all highly sensitive (0.97); but they were less specific, 0.60 for P0.1*f/Vt and 0.40 for P0.1 and f/VT. The areas under the ROC curves for P0.1*f/VT, P0.1, and f/VT were not significantly different. We conclude that P0.1*f/VT has equivalent sensitivity as P0.1 and f/VT. P0.1 slightly improves the specificity of f/VT in predicting weaning success.

No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARY1. The ability of normal subjects to estimate the magnitude of resistive loads and to detect resistive loads was determined using standard psychophysical techniques. The experiments were repeated during maintained partial neuromuscular blockade with D-tubocurarine.2. During curarization the ability to detect the presence of a small inspiratory resistive load was not significantly impaired. This finding is consistent with the view that changes in the usual breath-by-breath relation between pressure and flow mediate detection.3. The size of resistive loads was over-estimated during partial curarization. Subjects thus placed more reliance on sensing the increased motor command required during curarization than on alternative peripheral signals related to pressure, flow or resistance.4. The exponent for the power function relating the perceived magnitude of a resistive load to its actual size (Stevens, 1957) was reduced during partial neuromuscular blockade.5. These results suggest that detection of resistive loads depends upon sensing apparent information arising from an unexpected pressure-flow disturbance but that estimation of the size of an added load depends, in part, on sensing the outgoing motor command.