Deregulation of the electric power market globally will lead to increased requirement for electricity on demand resulting in more emphasis on 'hydropeaking' generation. A research study was conducted on the regulated West Salmon River, Newfoundland, Canada, to examine habitat selection and movement of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in response to flow changes related to 'experimental' peaking flow power generation. Fish were surgically implanted with microscale radio transmitters, released into an experimental study, and discharge was experimentally manipulated simulating two scenarios: (i) water storage during the day and generation at night, with a 2 hour transition; and (ii) night-time storage with generation during the day. Experiments were repeated in the summer and fall. Fish were tracked throughout the diurnal cycle of each manipulation and precisely positioned in two-dimensional space. Atlantic salmon exhibited two distinct patterns to movement: fish that showed high site fidelity and those that moved considerably during trials. Both salmon and trout were more active during fall hydropeaking experiments. Fish generally did not move long distances and moved more in a longitudinal fashion than laterally. Salmon moved greater distances, on average, than trout under all experimental conditions and during both seasons but these differences were not statistically significant. Brook trout moved more in relation to dynamic events (up-and down-ramping) than at steady state flows. Trout also moved more at night during these dynamic changes and under low flow conditions. These results will assist producers of hydroelectricity to reduce the impacts of hydropeaking operations on fish and fish habitat.

Variable hydropower production leads to hydropeaking, which causes discharge fluctuations that are potentially harmful to aquatic organisms. In this study, an experimental approach was used to investigate hydropeaking effects and associated hydraulic and habitat conditions on the home range and movement of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Prior studies examined the responses of Atlantic salmon and brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis to experimental hydropeaking during summer and autumn. The present study focused on Atlantic salmon, involved more rapid and extreme discharge manipulation, and included winter experiments to reflect influences of reduced temperature, ice conditions, and seasonal differences in behavior and habitat selection. Experiments were conducted over a range in discharge (0.5-5.0 m 3 /s) that resulted in dramatic habitat changes in the wide, shallow, boulder-strewn study reach. Experiments were repeated in summer and winter; however, the winter range in discharge was narrower due to constraints on water release. Fish response was monitored using manual telemetry in both seasons, and fixed telemetry was used to monitor fine-scale diel winter movements. Atlantic salmon had larger home ranges and were more mobile during all flow conditions and over diel cycles in summer than in winter, and there was anecdotal evidence of stranding in isolated pools in summer. Stream morphology, in addition to the magnitude of discharge change, was an important determinant of the propensity to move. In our study, there were considerable refugia from increased velocity and dewatering, which may have reduced the need to move. In winter, fish remained relatively sedentary in comparison with the summer foraging period, and this behavior may increase the likelihood for dewatering, stranding, and freezing. A secondary concern with hydropeaking regimes is the energetic cost to fish of moving to find suitable habitats, and during summer this cost could affect stored energy reserves, which could, in turn, affect overwinter survival.

In insular Newfoundland, Canada, studies were conducted from 1999 to 2003 on the effects of 'simulated' hydropeaking power generation on juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In 1999, Atlantic salmon parr were released into an experimental reach below a hydroelectric facility and flow was manipulated over a range of discharge (1.0-4.2 m 3 s -1 ) during a series of 'experiments' simulating hydropeaking in both summer and fall. Fish were implanted with radio transmitters, manually tracked, precisely located (±1 m), habitat selection evaluated, and movement response determined. Experiments were continued in 2002 and 2003 to contrast response of salmon between summer and winter, the magnitude of flow changes were greater (0.7-5.2 m 3 s -1 ) and changes were made more rapidly (instantly). As discharge was increased, velocity and depth use by parr increased, and fish adapted behaviourally by increased contact with the substrate. Salmon parr also exhibited two distinct movement patterns in the summer and fall of 1999 studies; high site fidelity or considerable movement during trials. Salmon were more mobile during both static and dynamic flow conditions and throughout the diel cycle in the summer of 2002 experiment, and 2 fish were stranded and died, the only time this happened in the four series of experiments. Within each experiment generally there were no differences between movements at static high and low flows for day and night movements, with one exception, and night time movements were always greatest, again with one exception. During dynamic flow changes, within each experiment, distances moved during down ramping and up ramping were not significantly different except in the summer of 1999. Overall, comparing between experiments for up and down ramping events, distances moved in the summer of 2002 were statistically higher than for all other experiments. Not surprisingly, the home ranges of fish in the summer of 2002 were also the greatest while the smallest home ranges were in the winter of 2003. Results suggest hydropeaking regimes may be energetically costly potentially affecting over-winter survival which is related to energy reserves obtained during summer. Collectively these studies provide comprehensive information on the response of juvenile Atlantic salmon parr to hydropeaking, on both diel and seasonal scales, and will assist hydro producers and regulators design and operate hydropeaking regimes to minimize ecological impact.

The effect of increased flow on movement and microhabitat use of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar parr in winter was investigated using radiotelemetry. To simulate hydropeaking operations, flow was increased four-fold from 1Á3 m 3 s À1 to 5Á2 m 3 s À1 for 24 h periods. Flow did not affect fish habitat use or displacement and had little effect on fish activity within diel periods. During high flow periods in late winter, fish reduced night-time activity. Stranding rates during flow reduction were also very low (only one fish).

In 2002 and 2003, the Bishops Falls hydroelectric generating facility on the Exploits River, insular Newfoundland, Canada, underwent extensive refurbishing including replacement of turbines and installation of a 'retrofitted' bypass and fish handling system. The effectiveness of this new bypass system has been assessed during the annual downstream run of wild Atlantic salmon smolt and kelt in smolt were radio tagged and released between June 9 and July 2, in the forebay of the hydro plant (19 releases) and one upstream (in-river) release. Fish guidance efficiency (FGE) of the system overall was 63% (123 of 195 fish) with 36 fish passing through the turbines, and six known mortalities. In 2004, between June 9 and July 2, a total of 358 smolt and 103 kelt were released in the forebay in 45 and 13 releases (n = 8 per release), respectively. The FGE of the system for smolt was 71.7% (257 of 358 fish) and for kelt was 92.3% (95 of 103 fish). In 2004, 96 tagged smolt passed through the turbines and 43 (44.8%) were detected at a downstream station confirming they had survived turbine passage, suggesting an overall survival of smolt passage of the Bishops Falls hydro facility in the order of 85%. A total of seven kelts (6.8%) passed through the turbines and were not detected 1.5 km downstream suggesting they did not survive turbine passage. Smolt spent on average 39.8 h in the forebay before exiting in 2003 and forebay residency averaged 26 h in 2004. In both years, most smolt selected their passage route, actively or passively, within the first 10 h with secondary peaks at 25-30 and 50-55 h, corresponding to evening passage in the second and third night, after release. Few smolt were bypassed or entrained into turbines during daylight hours. In both years turbine passed smolt spent more time in the forebay suggesting the longer fish reside in the forebay the greater the likelihood of turbine entrainment. Kelt were either bypassed or turbine entrained relatively quickly, within 2 h of release, and virtually all kelts were bypassed/turbine entrained during the hours of 18:00 and 01:00. These data on fish behavior and residency in the forebay will assist further refinement of operations of the bypass facility to optimize survival.