No abstract

An increase in blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability after subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) has been described in humans and has been correlated with delayed cerebral ischemia and poor clinical outcome. Few studies examined in the laboratory the relationship between SAH and BBB, with contrasting results due to limitations in experimental probes adopted and in timing of observation. The aim of this study was to quantify the time-course of BBB changes after experimental SAH. Groups of eight rats received injections of 400 microl of autologous arterial blood into the cisterna magna. BBB was assessed 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after SAH and in sham-operated animals separately for cerebral cortex, i.e. frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital, subcortical gray matter (Caudate-Putamen-Thalamus), cerebellar cortex and nuclei, and brain stem by a spectrophotofluorimetric evaluation of Evans Blue dye extravasation. As compared to sham-operated controls, SAH determined a significant BBB permeability change beginning 36 hours after SAH, peaking at 48 hours, and normalizing on day 3. This study provides a quantitative description of the temporal progression and recovery of BBB dysfunction after SAH. These results have implications for the management of aneurysm patients and for assessing the rationale and the therapeutic window of new pharmacological approaches.

No abstract

These results demonstrate useful antivasospastic and brain-protective actions of AVS after induction of experimental SAH and provide support for observations of beneficial effects of AVS made in the clinical setting.

The behavioural and convulsant effects of imipenem and meropenem were studied after intraperitoneal administration in DBA/2 mice, a strain genetically susceptible to sound-induced seizure, and in C57 mice, a strain not prone to seizure. DBA/2 mice were more susceptible than C57 mice to seizures induced by imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem. Imipenem was also 1.9 times more potent than meropenem in inducing clonus in DBA/2 mice. To investigate the possibility that the seizure-inducing activity of imipenem might be due to a probenecid-like effect of cilastatin, animals were treated with imipenem alone. No significant differences were observed between imipenem-cilastatin and imipenem-treated animals. Thus, it is reasonable to exclude a probenecid-like effect of cilastatin. Although the main mechanism for seizure-like activity of imipenem cannot be easily determined, we believe that several mechanisms may be involved. An increased excitation of the central nervous system (CNS) by inhibition of GABA binding to receptors and a slow clearance of imipenem from the CNS may be postulated. Cilastatin did not induce seizures. In addition, meropenem, a compound structurally related to imipenem, showed weak or no convulsant effects.