BackgroundConsidering the antioxidant function of Vitamin C, also called ascorbic acid, it is widely used against viral infections such as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on in vitro, observational, and ecological studies. Many confounding factors that can affect Vitamin C levels. Thus, the association described to date may not be causal. To determine the causal relationship between genetically predicted plasma Vitamin C and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity, we performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) based on large samples.MethodsThe summary-level data for Vitamin C was obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis, which included 52,018 individuals from four studies of European ancestry. Data for COVID-19 HGI results were obtained from the meta-analysis of 35 GWASs with more than 1,000,000 subjects of European ancestry, including 32,494 cases with COVID-19 susceptibility and 1,316,207 controls, 9,986 cases with COVID-19 hospitalization and 1,877,672 controls, and 5,101 cases with COVID-19 severe disease and 1,383,241 controls. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to examine the effect of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms and COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, disease severity. Several sensitivity analyses were performed with inverse-variance weighted (random-effect model), inverse variance weighted (fixed-effect model), weighted median, and maximum likelihood methods for estimating the causal effects.ResultsIn this MR study, genetic predisposition to the levels of plasma Vitamin C was not associated with COVID-19 susceptibility (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84–1.17, P = 0.91), hospitalization (OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.71–1.71, P = 0.67) and severity (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.43–1.59, P = 0.58). The association was consistent in complementary analyses. No potential heterogeneities and directional pleiotropies were observed for the analysis results.ConclusionAccording to our study, no correlation was observed between plasma Vitamin C levels and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Further studies in different ethnics are necessary to explore the potential role and mechanisms of circulating serum Vitamin C levels on COVID-19.

BackgroundCow milk contains more calcium, magnesium, potassium, zinc, and phosphorus minerals. For a long time, people have believed that increasing milk intake is beneficial to increasing bone density. Many confounding factors can affect milk consumption, and thus the association described to date may not be causal. We explored the causal relationship between genetically predicted milk consumption and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the femoral neck and lumbar spine based on 53,236 individuals from 27 studies of European ancestry using the Mendelian randomization (MR) study. 32,961 individuals of European and East Asian ancestry were used for sensitivity analysis.MethodsA genetic instrument used for evaluating milk consumption is rs4988235, a locus located at 13,910 base pairs upstream of the LCT gene. A Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to study the effect of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and BMD. The summary-level data for BMD of the femoral neck and lumbar spine were obtained from two GWAS meta-analyses [‘Data Release 2012’ and ‘Data Release 2015’ in the GEnetic Factors for OSteoporosis Consortium (GEFOS)].Resultswe found that genetically predicted milk consumption was not associated with FN-BMD(OR 1.007; 95% CI 0.991–1.023; P = 0.385), LS-BMD(OR 1.003; 95% CI 0.983–1.024; P = 0.743) by performing a meta-analysis of several different cohort studies. High levels of genetically predicted milk intake were positively associated with increased FN-BMD in Women. The OR for each additional milk intake increasing allele was 1.032 (95%CI 1.005–1.059; P = 0.014). However, no causal relationship was found between milk consumption and FN-BMD in men (OR 0.996; 95% CI 0.964–1.029; P = 0.839). Genetically predicted milk consumption was not significantly associated with LS-BMD in women (OR 1.017; 95% CI 0.991–1.043; P = 0.198) and men (OR 1.011; 95% CI 0.978–1.045; P = 0.523).ConclusionOur study found that women who consume more milk have a higher FN-BMD. When studying the effect of milk consumption on bone density in further studies, we need to pay more attention to women.