The limitations of classical diagnostic methods for invasive Candida infections have led to the development of molecular techniques such as real-time PCR to improve diagnosis. However, the detection of low titres of Candida DNA in blood from patients with candidaemia requires the use of extraction methods that efficiently lyse yeast cells and recover small amounts of DNA suitable for amplification. In this study, a Candida-specific real-time PCR assay was used to detect Candida albicans DNA in inoculated whole blood specimens extracted using seven different extraction protocols. The yield and quality of total nucleic acids were estimated using UV absorbance, and specific recovery of C. albicans genomic DNA was estimated quantitatively in comparison with a reference (Qiagen kit/lyticase) method currently in use in our laboratory. The extraction protocols were also compared with respect to sensitivity, cost and time required for completion. The TaqMan PCR assay used to amplify the DNA extracts achieved high levels of specificity, sensitivity and reproducibility. Of the seven extraction protocols evaluated, only the MasterPure yeast DNA extraction reagent kit gave significantly higher total nucleic acid yields than the reference method, although nucleic acid purity was highest using either the reference or YeaStar genomic DNA kit methods. More importantly, the YeaStar method enabled C. albicans DNA to be detected with highest sensitivity over the entire range of copy numbers evaluated, and appears to be an optimal method for extracting Candida DNA from whole blood.
INTRODUCTIONBlood culture remains the accepted 'gold standard' method for diagnosis of candidiasis and can be highly sensitive. However, in some settings, culture can fail to detect Candida spp. in more than 50 % of patients with chronic disseminated candidiasis MoreiraOliveira et al., 2005). Molecular methods, particularly realtime PCR, are increasingly used alongside conventional microbiological techniques for the diagnosis of systemic candidiasis (Klingspor & Jalal, 2006; Kasai et al., 2006; Löffler et al., 2000;Schabereiter-Gurtner et al., 2007;Bretagne & Costa., 2005;White et al., 2006;Maaroufi et al., 2003; Moreira-Oliveira et al., 2005). However, two major limitations of PCR are the difficulty associated with breaking yeast cell walls to release Candida spp. DNA suitable for amplification (Maaroufi et al., 2004; Löffler et al., 1997) and limited sensitivity when the assays are adapted for testing clinical specimens, such as blood samples, in which the amounts of fungal DNA may be very low (White et al., 2003; Löffler et al., 2000;Ahmad et al., 2002;Challier et al., 2004). As a consequence, these tests are not yet recognized as part of the consensus diagnostic criteria, in contrast to some antigenaemia detection kits (Ascioglu et al., 2002).The yeast cell is notoriously difficult to lyse due to a highly complex cell wall structure that provides rigidity (Müller et al., 1998). Moreover, it has been suggested that the fungal load in blood from ...