No abstract

This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

No abstract

To maximize fitness, plant pathogenic viruses may manipulate their arthropod vectors through direct and indirect (via the host plant) interactions. For many virus-vector-plant associations, insect feeding does not always lead to virus acquisition. In fact, many plant viruses, especially those that propagate into their vectors, are acquired at low rates. Although the majority of insects colonizing an infected plant escape from viral infection, they are still exposed to the indirect effects (i.e. the effect of plant metabolism modification following virus infection). Little information has been reported on the effects of plant viruses on insects that become infected versus those that do not (here referred to as "exposed"). The effect that the Maize mosaic virus (MMV) (Rhabdoviridae) exerts on the fitness and wing dimorphism of the planthopper vector, Peregrinus maidis (Hemiptera, Delphacidae), that developed on leaves from either young or old corn plants was examined. MMV exerted non-consistent to minimal direct effects on developmental time, longevity, nymphal mortality and fecundity. In addition, some small yet significant fitness costs were encountered by exposed planthoppers to escape MMV infection. Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of macropters over brachypters were produced on MMV-infected old leaves compared with healthy leaves of a similar age. We conclude that the virus influences the dispersal of the vector, promoting a larger production of macropters at the costs of brachypters at a late stage of the plant infection. Because MMV infection in planthoppers did not segregate by wing morphotype, our results indicate that the dispersal of both infected and exposed planthoppers was a likely consequence of the indirect effects of MMV.

Insects often harbour heritable symbionts that provide defence against specialized natural enemies, yet little is known about symbiont protection when hosts face simultaneous threats. In pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum), the facultative endosymbiont Hamiltonella defensa confers protection against the parasitoid, Aphidius ervi, and Regiella insecticola protects against aphid-specific fungal pathogens, including Pandora neoaphidis. Here, we investigated whether these two common aphid symbionts protect against a specialized virus A. pisum virus (APV), and whether their antifungal and antiparasitoid services are impacted by APV infection. We found that APV imposed large fitness costs on symbiont-free aphids and these costs were elevated in aphids also housing H. defensa. In contrast, APV titres were significantly reduced and costs to APV infection were largely eliminated in aphids with R. insecticola. To our knowledge, R. insecticola is the first aphid symbiont shown to protect against a viral pathogen, and only the second arthropod symbiont reported to do so. In contrast, APV infection did not impact the protective services of either R. insecticola or H. defensa. To better understand APV biology, we produced five genomes and examined transmission routes. We found that moderate rates of vertical transmission, combined with horizontal transfer through food plants, were the major route of APV spread, although lateral transfer by parasitoids also occurred. Transmission was unaffected by facultative symbionts. In summary, the presence and species identity of facultative symbionts resulted in highly divergent outcomes for aphids infected with APV, while not impacting defensive services that target other enemies. These findings add to the diverse phenotypes conferred by aphid symbionts, and to the growing body of work highlighting extensive variation in symbiont-mediated interactions.