As dental caries prevalence is still high in many populations and groups of both children and adults worldwide, and as caries continues to be responsible for significant health, social and economic impacts, there is an urgent need for dental students to receive a systematic education in cariology based upon current best evidence. Although European curriculum guidelines for undergraduate students have been prepared in other dental fields over the last decade, none exist for cariology. Thus the European Organisation for Caries Research (ORCA) formed a task force to work with the Association of Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) on a European Core Curriculum in Cariology. In 2010, a workshop to develop such a curriculum was organised in Berlin, Germany, with 75 participants from 24 European and 3 North/South American countries. The Curriculum was debated by five pre‐identified working groups: I The Knowledge Base; II Risk Assessment, Diagnosis and Synthesis; III Decision‐Making and Preventive Non‐surgical Therapy; IV Decision‐making and Surgical Therapy; and V Evidence‐based Cariology in Clinical and Public Health Practice and then finalised jointly by the group chairs. According to this Curriculum, on graduation, a dentist must be competent at applying knowledge and understanding of the biological, medical, basic and applied clinical sciences in order to recognise caries and make decisions about its prevention and management in individuals and populations. This document, which presents several major and numerous supporting competences, does not confine itself to dental caries alone, but refers also to dental erosion/non‐erosive wear and other dental hard tissue disorders.

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of root caries in the adult population of Pomerania, Germany. The study sample comprised 6,267 randomly selected subjects who were scheduled for examination from 1997 to 2001 (population-based cross-sectional study, response rate: 69%, age range 20–79 years). 499 edentulous persons were excluded from the dental examination (12%) performed according to WHO guidelines (1997). In the statistical analysis, frequency distributions, means and median values were calculated and subdivided for different age groups. The percentage of exposed and affected root surfaces increased with age (root caries index 4.6–10.6%). The mean number of carious/filled root surfaces (RDFS) rose from 0.4 per person (25–34 years) to 2.3 (55–64 years) and dropped for seniors due to the low number of retained teeth. Fillings comprised the largest proportion of the RDFS (69.5%). Most caries/fillings were found on buccal surfaces, the highest rate in mandibular premolars. With about half of over-45-year-olds having at least one carious/filled root surface and increasing number of retained teeth in seniors, root caries is a relevant and probably growing disease in Pomerania and East Germany.

The aim of this 3-year longitudinal study was to analyze caries increment and the caries-preventive effect of sealants in adolescents in the setting of the German national health system. 434 pupils (193 male, 241 female) took part in compulsory school examinations at age 12 (mean 12.3 ± 0.4 years) and 15 (mean 15.6 ± 0.3 years) according to WHO criteria, including the examination of sealants. Mean DMFT increased from 1.78 (± 2.15) to 3.97 (± 3.68), mean DMFS from 2.79 (±4.07) to 6.94 DMFS (± 8.34), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that high caries incidence at the individual level was mostly associated with the type of school (’Gymnasium’, RR = 0.3), gender (female, RR = 2.08) and high baseline DMFS (RR = 1.2 per surface), but not with the number of sealants. In an interaction model, adolescents with high baseline DMFS values had an even higher risk of caries increment with an increasing number of sealants compared to adolescents with fewer sealants (p = 0.047). At the tooth level, this effect was detected for first permanent molars, while sealants in premolars and second permanent molars did not result in a statistically significant caries-preventive effect due to the low caries incidence on these surfaces. Thus, sealants on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars were only protective in individuals with low or moderate caries activity (p = 0.006), which indicates the need for other measures to reduce caries activity in high risk adolescents. In addition, rates of 19% lost sealants and 18% carious or filled surfaces in 3 years suggest a discrepancy between sealant retention under real-life conditions and the results of controlled clinical trials.

With this novel method, gingival papillary edema can be quantified in vivo from replicas of the clinical situation.

The aim of this prospective crossover study was to compare the efficacy of two methods of plaque removal on partially erupted occlusal surfaces, which comprise about 80% of the sites affected by caries in schoolchildren. After a baseline examination, 16 children (aged 5–7 years) and their parents were instructed in cleaning the occlusal surface of an erupting molar either with an electric toothbrush or with a manual toothbrush in the cross-brushing technique. After 2 weeks, the proportion of the occlusal surface covered by plaque was measured again using the occlusal plaque index, a new, highly reproducible method (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.90). For the next 2 weeks, they used the other technique. In the multifactorial variance analysis, the individual child and parents were the most important factor for the amount of plaque present. Secondly, both methods resulted in about 50% less plaque on occlusal surfaces compared to baseline (29.2%) with a slightly but significantly smaller mean value for the electric toothbrush (14.7%, manual cross-brushing technique 16.7%; p = 0.025).

This paper is part of a series of papers contributing towards a European Core Curriculum in Cariology for undergraduate dental students. The European Core Curriculum in Cariology is the outcome of a process starting in 2006 and culminating in a joint workshop of the European Organization for Caries Research together with the Association for Dental Education in Europe, which was held in Berlin from 27 to 30 June 2010. The scope of this paper is to present the evidence‐based cariology in clinical and public health section of the European Core Curriculum in Cariology. This section was developed on the basis of international consensus on the current and future educational needs in the fields of cariology and disorders of dental hard tissues. The paper will deal with the core skills of evidence‐based dental practice within the undergraduate curriculum underpinning the dual facets of clinical cariology (relating particularly to individuals) and public health cariology (relating particularly to groups/societies). Core competencies in evidence‐based dentistry, which are generic to the undergraduate curriculum as a whole and not only cariology, are integral to lifelong learning skills within dentistry. As the clinical cariology competencies in assessment and management of caries for the individual patient are dealt with within other sections of the European Core Curriculum in Cariology, only a few relevant examples will be presented here, but for Public Health Cariology, the competencies will be explored within this document and their relationship to the principles of evidence‐based dentistry discussed.

The survey indicates a distinct discrepancy between a generally positive attitude towards the usefulness of computer technology for dental education, the level of familiarity with current computer systems and their actual use. However, two prerequisites for ultimately decreasing the cost and increasing the usage of CAS systems--the acceptance of approved learning content and English as the language of instruction in CAS systems--seem to be generally accepted by respondents.

To be able to generalize studies, it is important to know whether responders and nonresponders differ significantly. These data are usually not available. To assess whether responders and nonresponders differed significantly, 319 first and second graders in Greifswald, Germany took part in a compulsory dental school examination. Their parents completed a questionnaire on oral health topics and were asked to decide about their children’s participation in a school-based caries prevention program plus anonymous scientific evaluation. The 91 children who were not allowed to participate (nonresponders) were older (mean 8.5 years) than the 228 responders (mean 8.1 years; p < 0.001), mostly because of a few older children having repeated a grade. In an age-adjusted analysis, nonresponders exhibited in 21 of 30 indices of higher caries and plaque values, less preventive measures and a lower rate of participation. The difference in caries in the permanent dentition and fluorosis reached statistical significance. This study suggests that nonresponders to caries prevention programs might comply less with preventive measures and exhibit poorer oral health than responders: a result which has to be taken into account in research and prevention programs in the community.